9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAir Pressure Guage Calibration
Leading reported evidence
Replace so i
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
The fronts had signs of wear, but didn't need to be replaced so I replaced the rears and had my favorite shop dial in more negative camber.
Leading evidence: 'Replace so i' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace so i' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
However, I was a bit baffled by the fact that I've been using the same air pressure that I've used all along (34-36f/42-44r hot)
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
However, I was a bit baffled by the fact that I've been using the same air pressure that I've used all along (34-36f/42-44r hot)
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T052503Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Short Version: How do you know if your air pressure guage is accurate (not off by 2-3 or more psi)?
Full Story:
A couple of weeks ago, I corded the outside of my brand new rear MS PS2's after 2 days on the track. The fronts had signs of wear, but didn't need to be replaced so I replaced the rears and had my favorite shop dial in more negative camber.
After a day on the track with the brand new rears, I later noticed extreme wear on the inside as well as the outside of my tires. A depth guage indicated 5/32, 9,32, and 5/32 of tread depth respectively on the inside, middle, and outside of all four tires. I've since concluded that I need more air pressure in my tires. However, I was a bit baffled by the fact that I've been using the same air pressure that I've used all along (34-36f/42-44r hot)
I later noticed that my pressure guage reads 4 psi when it's not in use. Comparing my guage against a couple of others, I confirmed that my guage is off 4 psi in the upper ranges as well. WTF!!!!
This was a very expensive lesson. It cost me a 1.5 sets of rear tires and about .6 of set of fronts.
How do you guys ensure acurate measurements????
Alot of times I grab 2 or 3 gauges (from others in the paddock) when I am out at the track and see if they all read the same. Just helps me to re-confirm that I am getting a proper reading. Also, I will know if my gauge if off with a delta of 4 PSI since that makes a huge difference in how my car handles on the track.
If 3 of the 4 are all saying 40psi and 1 is saying 45 psi then I am pretty sure that the 3 with consistent findings are correct and the 1 oddball is out of whack (technical term
)
