fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Are te 3.4 and 3.6 interchangeable?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHAre te 3.4 and 3.6 interchangeable?

Reported or suspected cause

of the electronics associated

Reported cause

No successful repair reported for this finding.

1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that report identifying a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Reported cause

It's not about the block....physically it all fits just fine with all of the mounting points being the same....the problem is all of the electronics associated with ECU.

Are te 3.4 and 3.6 interchangeable?
Frequently discussed work

Run into a used 3.4 out of a 1999 c2

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

He has been looking for a used engine to get it back on the road and has run into a used 3.4 out of a 1999 C2.

Are te 3.4 and 3.6 interchangeable?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'of the electronics associated' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'of the electronics associated' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Run into a used 3.4 out of a 1999 c2' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Run into a used 3.4 out of a 1999 c2

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

He has been looking for a used engine to get it back on the road and has run into a used 3.4 out of a 1999 C2.

Are te 3.4 and 3.6 interchangeable?
Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run into a used 3.4 out of a 1999 c2

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

He has been looking for a used engine to get it back on the road and has run into a used 3.4 out of a 1999 C2.

Are te 3.4 and 3.6 interchangeable?
Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

of the electronics associated

No successful repair reported for this finding.

1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Reported cause

It's not about the block....physically it all fits just fine with all of the mounting points being the same....the problem is all of the electronics associated with ECU.

Are te 3.4 and 3.6 interchangeable?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T005001Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

A friend of mine has a 2006 C4S that lost the engine to an IMS failure. He has been looking for a used engine to get it back on the road and has run into a used 3.4 out of a 1999 C2. Will this engine work in his 997. He would rather have a 3.6 but this is a deal he cant pass up if it will work. Thoughts?

POST 2Original post

Not without major changes to wiring harness, ECU, cluster, climate control (yes, odd, but true), etc. Different fueling (one is returnless), different variable cam timing systems. It wouldn't be an economical choice once all is said and done.

POST 3Original post

^ True, and after all is said and done it will have to go to the dealer because the key, rfid pill, ECU and immobilizer will all have to be reprogrammed. Very odd that a 2006 would have an IMSB problem. Who determined that?

POST 4Original post

Quotes source post: 16014840

+1 This is a big job...I did the reverse and did all of the above in reverse when I put A 2007 997S 3.8 in my 996.1 Just the rewiring alone was probably 10k not included the cluster,HVAC, abs pump etc. No way does this make sense since performance will be less. I did it because of increased performance. Much cheaper by like a factor of 3 or 4 to stick with 997 engine

POST 5Original post

^Lowpue went in the (only) direction that makes sense. IMO, if you are going to dump a crap ton of money into a conversion, the only way it makes sense (to me) is to upgrade to a newer or more performant power plant. Why would anyone do this to get into a smaller, older engine...(rhetorical question)

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 16015110

The intention was to save money not put more in for less. His thought was to take the 3.4 engine long block and swap the electronics sensors etc. I guess that we were unaware that it was a completely different block. Been in the GM small block world too long I guess.

POST 7Original post

My personal assessment is that he won't save any money doing this. The least expensive option (still risky) is to buy a salvage engine from a well reputed vendor from the same generation (996.2 donor, 996.2 recipient), with some sort of warranty. It's risky because you may be inheriting someone else's problems. It can work out though (I am living proof). You don't need to worry about converting anything: pure plug and play. And yes, said from experience, not internet theorizing..

POST 8Original post

Quotes source post: 16015133

It's not about the block....physically it all fits just fine with all of the mounting points being the same....the problem is all of the electronics associated with ECU.

POST 9Original post

Quotes source post: 16015199

Same here, I got lucky but it's risky. I know of a 3.6 being parted out if needed. PM me.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.