30 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHBE HONEST WITH THESE ANSWERS!!!!!
Reported or suspected cause
hour a day
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'hour a day' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'hour a day' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check rennlist, although it isn't easy' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Sometimes I can go several days without checking Rennlist, although it isn't easy.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
30 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T213932Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
1. Way too much.
2. Usually I'm either at work or she's sleeping. But she would definitely give me s**t if she knew the answer to 1.
3. Fairly consistent.
1. An hour or so a day but it seem like its increasing just now.
2. No. She has a forum that she wastes at least as much time with.
3. I think I spend more now than I did in the beginning.
1) Alot of hours
2) What wife - I have a P-car, Harley, Truck and Airplane - no room for a wife (I'm with Robyn on this)
3) Finding new ones every day but so far this is the best - steady
1) About half of my free time-1 to 2 hours
2) Yes, The other half of my free time
3) Steady, Although all the regional stuff that does not pertain to me bores me but I can't leave it unread
1. ~15 minutes 3-5 days a week, depending on how busy I am
2. Yes
3. Maybe a little less. The GT2/GT3 forum got really fascinating last summer (like a train wreck or a bad soap opera), and I spent a lot of time watching the fireworks.
1) whenever i'm near a computer, rennlist is in the background...i have a disease.
2) won't be married for another 8-10 years so HAH!
3) depends if its a forum pertaining to something i do. i don't street race much anymore so i don't go on the local forum for that, neither do i paintball. actually..now that i think about it, rennlist is the only one i still use on a consistent basis...then renntech and 6-speed (flat-6 and germantechnik are dead).
1. probably around 2-3 hours... sometimes more, depending on my workload
2. no wifey, not close either
-- but my friends give me **** all the time.. more like teasing than anything ha
3. same
1. About two hours a day on days off.
2. She is glad that I have harmless addictions that don't destroy family values, but still gives a sh*t sometimes anyway.
3. Less now, then before.
Put it this way. At the office, if I was able to block out car forum websites, and intentionally lose the password, I would be much more productive.
As I type this from my desk. Pathetic.
Unfortunately, I'm computer savvy enough to know I could just d'l another web browser and start back up again, so why bother?
(1) About half an hour each day max. Sometimes I can go several days without checking Rennlist, although it isn't easy.
(2) Not married yet.
(3) Not sure.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
