10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCoolant level sensor info
Leading reported evidence
Disconnect circuit is open and the light does not flash
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
With the sensor disconnected the circuit is open and the light does not flash.
Leading evidence: 'Disconnect circuit is open and the light does not flash' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check continuity' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
In an effort to isolate the fault to the coolant level sensor (the light blinks even with expansion tank level up to "max"), I disconnected the sensor.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Over AU$25k was spent (previous owner before last), I'm guessing they likely replaced the tank then.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I'll pull the sensor and check continuity with and without a magnet in proximity to the reed switch.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Tight space combined with large hands resulted in eventually disconnecting the cable but I have rotated the sensor in the tank a little.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
In an effort to isolate the fault to the coolant level sensor (the light blinks even with expansion tank level up to "max"), I disconnected the sensor.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T222516Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Currently trying to diagnose a coolant level sensor fault (fast blinking temp gauge) and a persistent minor coolant loss issue.
In an effort to isolate the fault to the coolant level sensor (the light blinks even with expansion tank level up to "max"), I disconnected the sensor. Tight space combined with large hands resulted in eventually disconnecting the cable but I have rotated the sensor in the tank a little.
Since then the coolant loss seems to have increased and I think it's getting out primarily around the sensor.
Can someone let me know which way the sensor connector should face? Is it directly towards the rear of the vehicle? Mine is currently at about 5-o'clock (looking from the top with 12 straight forward).
I tried to rotate it further clockwise but don't want to break it if shouldn't be going that far around.
The sensor appears faulty so I'll replace it next week, but in the meantime I'd like to try to arrest some of the coolant loss if I can.
Thanks.
The sensor doesn’t go all of the through into the tank. If it is leaking the tank is cracked. Sensor is “left handed” bayonet type latch. Turn it ~1/2 turn clockwise to remove. The sensor is pretty fragile don’t break it.
If you click on the Part #2 in this diagram (click on the blue part number) it will show you the bayonet part of the sensor. The sensor is not open to the coolant, so it cannot be where your leak is....unless the tank is cracked where the sensor fits in the coolant tank.
http://www.autoatlanta.com/porsche-p...section=105-20
This is great info and resolves many questions in my mind.
So if the sensor is loose, it won't affect the cooling system pressure, that's good news.
I'm guessing then that the sensor is a N.C. reed switch, and when installed is adjacent to a magnetic float in a slot on the other side of the tank wall, so when the level is correct the magnet floats up, lines up with the reed switch and opens the circuit. With the sensor disconnected the circuit is open and the light does not flash.
The persistent low coolant warning could then be either the sensor itself faulty or the float is stuck at the bottom of the slot. I'll pull the sensor and check continuity with and without a magnet in proximity to the reed switch.
My tank looks quite new, for a 1998 vehicle it is very white with no yellowing. The 3.4 motor was rebuilt in 2011 with a short block recon "big bore" 3.6 with Nickies and forged pistons. Over AU$25k was spent (previous owner before last), I'm guessing they likely replaced the tank then. Since then the car has done about 25,000km.
The motor was out again last year (to pin the drive sprocket to the IMS - there's a thread about that) and the car returned to me 6 weeks ago, since then the coolant seems to have been problematic. Perhaps something has not been tightly fitted during re-assembly and is the cause. I have a warranty on the recent work (AU$15k) so I think I'll take it back to the shop, hopefully it's something simple.
Thanks all for your help.
Another point of interest is that your car is a 98 model, all 996 built before Feb 99 were more prone to false illumination of the low coolant warning (blinking). There was a TBS and a new desgin coolant tank with better baffling to help with coolant slosh that caused the false warning. If your car has the original coolant tank, the false warning could be due to coolant slosh and will not go out until the key is cycled, All new tanks are of the revised design.
Yes in the ~2,000km I have put on the car that has happened to me two or three times. This time it has been persistent, surviving over key-out restarts.
Leak was worse this morning so drove straight to the shop, pressure test revealed expansion tank is split near the top. They're shipping one from interstate and fitting it Wednesday. I got the OEM / aftermarket one as the genuine one is nearly AU$1k. Also I ordered a new level sensor so they'll fit that to the new tank before it goes in.
This will likely tip my total post-purchase expenditure (since September) over the AU$20k mark.
1k AUD for the part alone?? I paid $800 installed including the tank, labour and new coolant from the dealership here in Melbourne last year (from memory, might have been the year before).
Who's doing the work? If you give me the part number of the tank you're after ill lookup the dealership part price in AUD for you.
Got my shop to procure an aftermarket tank (the genuine item was AU$1250, thanks @dan_189 for the info), Wednesday (yesterday) lunchtime took the new level sensor I bought with me for them to fit to the new tank, and went to get some lunch while they worked.
Got a call 90 minutes later, new tank is leaking around the level sensor, will need to procure a second one, should be there Friday, pick the car up in the PM.
Another call today at lunchtime (Thursday), new tank missed the overnight courier so won't be here until Tuesday (Monday is a holiday).
Too bad for my long weekend away with the wife, leaving the kids at home. Two strikes on that front for this car so far, couldn't take it to her end-of-year work function in the hills last year either due to the engine being in pieces in the shop. Grrr.
