6 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 C4 Mileage question
Reported or suspected cause
coolest thing i'll ever own
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
I do all my own work and its probably the coolest thing I'll ever own.
Leading evidence: 'coolest thing i'll ever own' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'coolest thing i'll ever own' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Run hills' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause · Original poster
I know this is probably a sign to run for the hills.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I know this is probably a sign to run for the hills.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T163944Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I have been pondering with the idea of getting a 996. And I have been reading a lot about them the last couple of weeks on and off. I have an 1984 928s with 147K miles. I do most of my maintenance and repairs myself so I am somewhat mechanically incline. I'm not a rich guy but make enough to enjoy my cars and work on them.
This isn't really a question about what all can go wrong and PPI's or IMS/RMS.
A car that I have located is at a used dealer its a 2000 996 Cab. C4 with about 140K miles on it. I have not called the dealership or anything. But I am assuming they know little about the car and probably has no service records. I know this is probably a sign to run for the hills. I know this can be open to all ends but how long can these motors last, one that probably hasn't been maintained per Porsche's service intervals. but regular oil changes and fluid changes.
I ask this because my 928 when I got it, had 140K miles on it and at the time I was a little worried. But I've put 7,000 miles on it over the last 2 years and it has been the most fun out of the toys I've owned. And I have a friend that has a 928 GTS with over 200K miles and runs great. So is a 996 with 140K miles is that pretty near the end of that motors life or could there be another 50K to 70K miles left in her. If the IMS doesn't kill it first.
Thanks, James
Just my opinion - if the IMSB has not blown apart @140K, probably never will. Given a reasonable maintenance history (or maybe not), these cars can do well over 140K. I have that on mine and it still looks and runs great. I've had to plug a lot of DIY maintenance into it, but I think that is part of the reward for such a great car. So my opinion is a 2000 996 with 140K has a lot of good miles left in it. It's always a gamble with a used car, but they are made damn well to begin with.
Could it go another 50-70k miles without blowing up? Sure, several cars documented at well over 200k miles. I guarantee you the dealer paid next to nothing for that car. No way a dealer is going to pay anything but low wholesale on a 996 with over 140k. I would guess they paid $8-11k max. Price your offer accordingly.
Good luck in the search and purchase. I'm in a similar boat. I've had my 928 for over 9 years now. I do all my own work and its probably the coolest thing I'll ever own. I picked up a very nicely sorted '99 C4 from a friend in May of last year. It had 107K at the time and is at 115k now. It has been a really nice driver and fun to own. Although engine access is a bit tighter and more awkward than in a 16V 928, most of the common failure items are pretty easy to get to (alternator, water pump, belts and hoses). 996s were not built by the same craftsman that built 928s. It was just a different era for Porsche. But they can be really nice cars and other than the old school stereo / NAV unit mine feels every bit as modern as anything else I've driven. Quite impressive for an 18 year old car.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.