fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Accelerometers

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
3 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHAccelerometers

Reported or suspected cause

where you put the meter

Reported cause

No successful repair reported for this finding.

1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that report identifying a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Reported cause

The problem is where you put the meter.

Original post Read captured discussion
Accelerometers
Frequently discussed work

Use by national car magazines

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Thank you for your answer, I'd like to see if this FX2 is popular as much as I think, since I heard also that it is used by national car magazines to measure the performance of the cars they test.

Original post Read captured discussion
Accelerometers
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'where you put the meter' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'where you put the meter' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Use by national car magazines' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 3 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

some error its still close

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

If you are getting 3.82 I suspect some error its still close to 4.0.

Original post Read captured discussion
Accelerometers

Use by national car magazines

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Thank you for your answer, I'd like to see if this FX2 is popular as much as I think, since I heard also that it is used by national car magazines to measure the performance of the cars they test.

Original post Read captured discussion
Accelerometers
Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use by national car magazines

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Thank you for your answer, I'd like to see if this FX2 is popular as much as I think, since I heard also that it is used by national car magazines to measure the performance of the cars they test.

Original post Read captured discussion
Accelerometers
Reported and suspected causes (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

where you put the meter

No successful repair reported for this finding.

1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Reported cause

The problem is where you put the meter.

Original post Read captured discussion
Accelerometers

some error its still close

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

If you are getting 3.82 I suspect some error its still close to 4.0.

Original post Read captured discussion
Accelerometers
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T142254Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I recently got an Accelerometers made by Beltronics. The name is FX2 and it gives the possibilities to measure how fast you do the 0-60, quarter mile, and several other things plus it gives the break down of a 0-60 with the 0-10, 10-20 and so on time: it is real cool, and precise, and it bases the measurements on the G force. Now: I did three times on a flat road a 0-60 in 3.82 with my TT. I did also on a soft decline a 0-60 in 3.28 (!). Normally I can do a 4 .0something with no problem all the times. Do anybody of you guys have this machine and what results did you get? Thank you for your answer, I'd like to see if this FX2 is popular as much as I think, since I heard also that it is used by national car magazines to measure the performance of the cars they test. Thank you, Iloveheat

POST 2Original post

got a gtech pro which is similar to yours, only less information i guess.. did the 0-60 in 5.1sec which is normal result for my kind of car.. ..drewling to know how 3.28 feels like! Waz 996 c2 99 6sp

POST 3Original post

I also got a G-tech. The problem is where you put the meter. If its put high up the windshield it will get false readings due to the pedilum effect. It senses more acceleration due to more movement if its on the windshield high up. That is the reson on a decline it read much faster. If you are getting 3.82 I suspect some error its still close to 4.0. If its a 10% error 3.8 plus 0.38 equals about 4.2 which is right for your car.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.