fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

'99 911 cab vs. '01 Boxster S

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
26 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH'99 911 cab vs. '01 Boxster S

Leading reported evidence

Replace first engine

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

The Boxster has water, and I didn't have any trouble with the Boxster after they replaced the first engine

'99 911 cab vs. '01 Boxster S
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace first engine' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace first engine' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 26 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace first engine

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

The Boxster has water, and I didn't have any trouble with the Boxster after they replaced the first engine

'99 911 cab vs. '01 Boxster S
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

26 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T144035Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

All things being equal in condition and mileage. Why buy the 911? I know what I expect to hear from this group. But, I'll ask anyway. Why would one go with the '99 911? Aside from "it's a 911." Thanks. --------------------------------------------------------- jaxon

POST 2Original post

More power, backseat, more leg room up front for us taller folks...

POST 3Original post

I think in years ahead the 911 will be more desirable than the boxster. Resale will be better and it held up in a better regards. More power always helps too.

POST 4Original post

not to mention the boxter has alot of wanna be look alike cars out, such as that toyota thing

POST 5Original post

When your talking to a girl what would you like to say? I drive a 911 or I drive a Boxster. I love saying 911. Bobby

POST 6Original post

drive them back to back, most people can tell where the extra money went on a 996. the question should be: if there's no difference in price, why the boxster?

POST 7Original post

I just got out of my Boxster S at considerable expense (would have been much cheaper to wait another year or two) to get back into a 911. The Boxster is a fun car, but a 911 is a 911 and a Boxster is not. In addition, the 911 should hold its value better. Therefore, I would lean heavily to the 911.

POST 8Original post

You should drive both, and if you couldn't tell the difference, then you should buy the newer car, that will be the boxterS.

POST 9Original post

Those two have many similarities, but different feels on the road. Drive and see if you have a preference. The 2001 model has a little warranty left, so if your pockets aren't deep you might consider that. You can be happy with either. Make a personal decision, not what anyone on this forum wants you to have.

POST 10Original post

I had the Boxster S and now I have a 911 cab. Honestly, they feel different. The best thing to do would be to try them both and see which one you like better...it's about you, not what the rest of the world think. Either way you'll be happy because both are that good.

POST 11Original post

You also need to ask this question in the Boxster forum section.

POST 12Original post

I had the same dilemma 3 months ago. I chose the 911 coupe because of the power difference and because I think the 996 is one of the best looking models of the 911 produced. I also like the roomier cockpit.

POST 14Original post

I couldn't have said it better - After owning a 986S and then getting back into a 996 Targa - They are truly night and day, the communication with the 996 is better, Roomier, Aggressive looking, better exhaust notes, more power. I love the look of My 986S but I am in love with the look of my 996 Targa. They are both really fun cars to drive. It's all relative...

POST 15 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Appreciate the info. I don't know what I'll do. So many great Porsche's out there. I owned a '99 Boxster for four year(pretty long for me!) and 951 at the same time. Went from there to an Audi TT. Thinking about what my next Porsche will be. I've always thought I wanted to try an aircooled. But, until I have time to tinker, I suspect I'd have to go with a 993 aircooled.(reliability). Heck, if I'm going that current, why not consider water. The Boxster has water, and I didn't have any trouble with the Boxster after they replaced the first engine As I began to think about the 996 alternatives, it occured to me that a Boxster S merits consideration. Anyway, that's what brought me here. While I know it ultimately comes down to what I like, it's always helpfull to hear from owners. You could have all said the '99's were a terrible year, get a '2000. That kind of help will only be found here. Thanks ----------------------------------------------------------------- Jaxon

POST 16Original post

In a sports car emergency, who do you dial? 911.

POST 17Original post

[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:] https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/roflmao.gif

POST 18Original post

I own both cars and those same years (01 Boxster S and 99 996 C4 Cab) , they both are awesome. Oddly, the 01 Boxster S is a more fun ride because it's very tossable and feels faster to me, but I own both cars. The 99 996 C4 Cab feels like a more substantial car and carried more weight in social circles. The fact is that the market for both Boxster S and 996s stink right now and neither car is hold its value. With the 911 history, I'm sure that the 996 value will be more consistent than the Boxster. Try them both out and see which is your preference.

POST 19Original post

I went from a 2000 Boxster S to my current 2004 911 coupe. They are both superb cars and you won't be disappointed with either one. I personally prefer the mid-engine handling of the Boxster and I think it is the better looking car. However, I'm not a huge fan of convertibles (I got the Boxster purely due to it's mid-engine layout) so I finally decided to part with the Boxster and got the only coupe Porsche makes; a 911. I love it, although the tail end definitely moves a lot more than in the Boxster at higher speed corners but I'm getting used to it. The power is awesome and I always hated the fact that you can't get a Boxster with the same motor. As far as where the money goes in a 911? In Porsche's pockets. Really, there is very little difference between equally equiped Boxsters and 911's. They cost Porsche almost the same amount to build yet the 911 has a huge premium on it compared to the Boxster, so it is pretty much profit in Porsche's bank account. Given the year of Boxster that you are considering, I think it has already taken its biggest depreciation hit so you should be okay with either car in that regard. For me, if they really do put a mid-engine coupe on the market with the same motor that is available in the 911, I will be switching to it; there is nothing like a mid-engined sports car

POST 20Original post

Thanks for saying that Pete, I too am adjusting to the fact that I enjoy driving the Boxster S more than the 911. But I find myself driving the 911 more for daily driving.

POST 21 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

It's a shame Porsche didn't make a Boxster S coupe. I agree that both are great cars. Excluding the back seat and ability to push the seats further back, is the 911 cabin bigger? I didn't notice it when I drove them.

POST 23Original post

Second trunk (that carries golf clubs for real), better handling (than almost anything), Boxster S is as quick as a 996 Cab... And to say the 996 has a back seat that counts for much is really stretching it. You put your clubs in through the side door and scratch your paint, I'll do it the "civilized" way.

POST 24Original post

"And to say the 996 has a back seat that counts for much is really stretching it. You put your clubs in through the side door and scratch your paint, I'll do it the "civilized" way " I would have to disagree - my two kids fit just fine in the back seats - in a couple of years - yes I will have a problem, but there's always moms AMG....

POST 25 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Regarding the seats. Depends on where you are in life. The back seats are a waste as far as I'm concerned. I've never liked them, and never had a use for them. That being said, they wouldn't be a factor in my decision either way. I do like the trunk in the Boxster. Once again, not a decision maker. ____________________________________________ Jaxon

POST 26Original post

Everybody has a boxster these days. They are everywhere on the road. Go with the 911. It definately has the "cool" factor. Nobody really respects the boxster. I had one for two years and most of my friends goofed on it and called it a "starter porsche". I've got a 996 cab now. Way nicer car. Looks better and is much faster. Go with the 996 and you won't be thinking about how soon you're gonna upgrade.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.