14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHTorque Solutions Motor Mounts any good?
Reported or suspected cause
big fan of the "orange cap" mod as well
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause · Original poster
I'm going to guess your probably a big fan of the "Orange Cap" mod as well...
Leading evidence: 'big fan of the "orange cap" mod as well' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'big fan of the "orange cap" mod as well' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Inspect individual components' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I even took the liberty to take them apart if people want to inspect individual components.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I'm looking to replace my worn OEM mounts before upcoming DE season...
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T000231Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm looking to replace my worn OEM mounts before upcoming DE season... can anyone recommend these mounts personally? How do they compare to RSS and Wevos? They are 25% less expensive so I thought I'd consider them if some found them to be equal or better than competition... Lifetime warranty is nice to boot.
I have these and they are basically the same as the RSS and Wevo's IMO. With that said, I'm currently running Function First with the Torque Solutions sitting on the shelf.
Very cool, many thanks for the pics as the website only shows from the top! That construction looks the same as RSS and Wevo... not sure the urethane density differences, but construction looks comparable... I placed my order for a set $280 shipped New on E-bay... can't wait to try out at my upcoming DE!
The Construction details from the Vendor:
*
Polyurethane
Pictured in BLUE to show design. You will receive in all black.
-Made out of lightweight 6061-T6 billet aluminum
-Black anodized / Torque Solution Laser engraved
-75A durometer bushings
-Life Time Warranty
-Made in USA
Definitely a Urethane material. Installed in 1 hr and test drove... Car now handles like a go-cart through turns and quick transitions! However, I was surprised what a difference it made to shifting... feels like I installed a new shifter, as throws were much tighter and more precise through the gates... and my car has less than 20k miles, so time really is a factor with these mounts degrading it appears.
Essentially minimal increase in NVH... maybe 5% at startup and through 2500-4000 rpm, but ots not harsh, just more raw which is not out of line for my sports car.
Anyone who is on the fence about this should really get it done already! Torque Solutions mounts get two thumbs up from me!
-John
John thanks for the review and share. The price point on these mounts seems pretty good vs. other semi-solid mounts. Curious any others have longer term experience with these mounts?
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
