27 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHwatch SC'd 996 build revs
Leading reported evidence
Run like this years
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'd be interested in your or Todd's comments on what has been done to ensure the car is still running like this years from now.
Leading evidence: 'Run like this years' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run like this years' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
27 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T140027Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
That is NASTY!!!
A true Wolf in Sheep's clothing. Interesting SC sounds... I can't remember, what exhaust are you running?
Nice one, Ben. Did Tire Rack ship today? LOL
Wow, Ben that is nice. That guy did a crappy job taking that video
I wonder who took it
. But really Ben's car is a sleeper and the car just screems
. Awsome
hey mike, the nearest track is quite a ways from here and both PCA and POC require a rollbar in my car (cause of upgrade brakes and suspension) - even before the SC. i'm not doing it. they both have conflicting requirements for the bars (diameters, etc), but they agree in that it should be an interior bastardizing endeavor as a result of it's required fastening.
"Wouldn't PCA allow your car with your hardtop?"
Don't have one, but that's a really good question. I think even coupes with my mods require a rollbar though.
Just to make it clear what Todd was saying it is 20HP over the 3.4L supercharged engines not just 20 more HP, and that comes to about 430-440HP and 350 lbs/tq.
That is really awesome, Ben! Congratulations on a great car.
Now comes the real test: reliability. I'd be interested in your or Todd's comments on what has been done to ensure the car is still running like this years from now.
=Carlos=
But I thought you were Mrs. Cleo? Ben. Ya Man
Anyways that is just a chance that you take when you go aftermarket, that is why you do some research and find the best tuner there is.
OK, you guys are no help! ;-)
Todd, besides wishin' and hoping, can you tell us more about why you think the engine and transmission will hold up OK under all this mass of newly found power?
=Carlos=
(Who'd really like to do this to his 996, but is concerned about reliability)
Rather than start a new thread about the debate TT/C4S, I thought I would add something here.
had the pleassure of spending 20 mins in Ben's SC 3.4 over noon hour on thanksgiving day. took me to his special track for a demo ride of Todd's handiwork. check out the video...does not do the work any justice!! smooth acceleration with no bumps... just thrust through most of the range. Nearly blew me away! really, todd has done an amazing piece of work that you must ride in to believe.
for a paltry sum, relative to buying a TT, choice is not an option. The cost/ value equation sets a new standard with this work.
Nice track Ben! Nothing like that in Ontario.
wonder what the package would do for me? 3.6 X51? what do you say Todd!
reliability? as Ben said, "kinda hard to tell what's going to happen years from now - today :-)"
you never can tell if you can't say for sure...
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
