Rennlist

ROW m030 02+ vs earlier

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

3 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHROW m030 02+ vs earlier

Leading reported evidence

Check before i spend a bunch

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
I just want to double check before I spend a bunch on money on an install next week.
Original post Read captured discussion
ROW m030 02+ vs earlier

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Check before i spend a bunch' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check before i spend a bunch' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 3 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Check with gert at

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
I'd check with Gert at
Original post Read captured discussion
ROW m030 02+ vs earlier

Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check before i spend a bunch

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
I just want to double check before I spend a bunch on money on an install next week.
Original post Read captured discussion
ROW m030 02+ vs earlier

Check with gert at

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
I'd check with Gert at
Original post Read captured discussion
ROW m030 02+ vs earlier

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T183130Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Does anybody know if Porsche revised the ROW M030 suspension on 02+ cars? I know in the US they did revise the standard suspension and the part numbers for standard US springs/shocks changed. Did this happen with the M030 also? Does anyone have the correct ROW M030 part numbers for an '03 C2 Manual Coupe? I just want to double check before I spend a bunch on money on an install next week. Thanks!

POST 2Original post

As far as I know the suspension is the same. I'd check with Gert at www.carnewal.com. If you have not already purchased the stuff, he sells a kit. I bought mine from him, gave him a credit card and had the stuff by the end of the week. Roy

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I would love to order from him. I've ordered other things from him. But I can't find an experienced shop here in my area who is willing to install something I bring in from Gert. On the other hand, I don't trust the shop as well as I trust Gert in terms of getting the right part numbers. That's why I want to double check. Thanks.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.