12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHYeah, it's one of a kind all right!
Leading reported evidence
Clean puke off my monitor and keyboard
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Ok, just finished cleaning the puke off my monitor and keyboard.
Leading evidence: 'Clean puke off my monitor and keyboard' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean puke off my monitor and keyboard' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T174436Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I can't believe they were dumb enough to take that car in trade unless they got for next to nothing.
Maybe Mary Kay Cosmetics is now offering Porsches to the top sales people!
Nice christmas present for the wife, but she doesn't drive a stick.
I suppose I could give her my tip, but it....errr.....aaaa....doesn't have a....er...aaaaa...oh yeah a 3 spoke wheel, so....no way I could live with that!!!!!!!!
guess I will have to pass..........
I wonder if the paint technicians at Zuffenhausen felt like they needed to take a long hot shower and then have the spray booth exorcised after this car body went through?
Seriously, some sugar daddy had to have ordered this pink pig for his little hottie. The only way such a stain can be explained is the little head doin' all the talkin' for the big head!! I can't imagine anyone with a love for the marque doing this to such a fine machine. yeccchhhh.....
Jeff
You know, after the first wave of nausia passed, I scrolled down to the interior pcitures and was nearly overwhelmed. Is it true that the pink leather seat inserts actually came from the factory? This was a factory option?
If so, the guys in the upholstry shop in Germany must have had one hell of a laugh!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
