17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHEngine Failure..
Leading reported evidence
Check on the fluids, or might have handled it rough
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I only have doubts that the new owner was somehow careless in keeping a regular check on the fluids, or might have handled it rough.
Leading evidence: 'Check on the fluids, or might have handled it rough' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check on the fluids, or might have handled it rough' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
says he was driving normally, suddenly the engine smoked like a bbq filling the whole bay and cabin...
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I don't dump the clutch ever, that's just a bad idea in the long run period.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T031046Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I got a call today from the new owner of my previous 996 (sold 6 months back),
says he was driving normally, suddenly the engine smoked like a bbq filling the whole bay and cabin... Temperature and oil were normal at the time..
Upon dropping the engine at the mechanic, the diagnostic was a cracked engine block which mixed water and oil leading to the fumes..
Is this a common engine failure in 996's.. what could be the possible reasons?
Any comments appreciated..
Wael
Previous: 996 C2 1999 Manual 70,000km when sold
I would hope and assume Porsche designed the engine to run at redline for extended peroids of time, wouldn't you?
Its sad to see all these 996 engine and gearbox failures, and especially sad to hear about the dealers not covering customers that took their 996's to the track! Isn't this supposed to be the ultimate sports car?
As much as I am starting to like the 996's, I would be really afraid to have one out of warranty..
Man, you guys are harshing on Wael!
I've read many of Wael's posts, many stories of high speed pusuits and close encounters in a country where excessive speed is not excessive, but hey, can anyone tell him something constructive?
I thought the early 996 had this issue. A friend of mine had the same thing happen, only the dealer found during a routine service and the engine was promptly replaced. According to the dealer, it was a known problem. Something about casting problems? I'm keeping my fingers crossed since my car is now 60k plus miles and I'm out of warrantee.
Thanks Charles and Brian! I really wanted an advice or a similar experience since the car is in Lagos which is void of any competent mechanic. I thought I'd find some sort of clue here..
My reason for this post was more to understand what could be behind such an engine failure.. I took care of the car as much as I could, knowing that I also took it to its limits (and mine!).. I only have doubts that the new owner was somehow careless in keeping a regular check on the fluids, or might have handled it rough.
On the other hand: Guys, they're just cars! It's not about possession or upkeeping only. It's the feeling of having been there whenever the idea crosses your mind or even when you see one going by.. And for that to happen, trust me, YOU SHOULD HIT REDLINESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!
Waz
Yeah! are we supposed to drive like a granny around town, just showing off our shinny Porsche? lets not go over 3k RPM or much less track them just in case, give me a break guys! You can't critisize that? we are talking about sportcars!
This is a common problem that happens to 996's that were not driven like they are supposed to be too. Lets be a little more constructive, anybody have any experience or advice with this?
I hit the redline EVERYDAY, thats why we buy a Porsche right?
Everyone is so quick to criticize until it happens to them then it is not funny!!! It is a little disappointing that this generation has what I would call quality issues. I came from a 94 C4 and it was trouble free.
I good friend �Porsche mechanic� indicated that the engine�s sometimes just grenades. Porsche is aware of it and will usually give a new engine. I don�t know about you guys but this scare�s the crap out of me having a 99 out of warrantee. It�s not like buying a new crate motor for your vette. Were talking big bucks. This is more compelling because if you want to buy extended warrantees can you trust that company to be there when you need a claim..
Don�t get me wrong I love this car and it has been trouble free. I guess we need to keep an eye on this!!
I like to drive my cars hard but not abuse them. I don't dump the clutch ever, that's just a bad idea in the long run period. Doing things along that nature just shows disrespect for the car.
I hear ya - respect the car, and it will respect you (and your wallet).
I don't even know what clutch dumping is, but anything that would
cause me to use the word "dump" with my baby
ain't
gonna happen!
true, we buy sports cars to drive them like sports cars...i've always driven my VWs, Hondas, etc like race cars. Never gone through a clutch or engine and then when some regular joe buys my car, it's trashed in no time. why, lack of care, maintenance and knowing how to drive a car, easy or hard. you can baby a car in my opinion at any rpm...it's all in how you deal with rpms, hard cornering, etc. nothing takes the place of good maintenance and "respect" as mentioned above. let's drive 'em hard...if I live to be like my grandfathers 80s-90s, I'm not gonna be like them and be saying, "what if?
Yeah rdsii!
I have had mine since new for 3 years. It's been brilliant up to about 4 months back. I never tracked mine and I guess I have driven it like a granny..apart from the odd blast here and there.....but it is a Porker after all. I loved this car and would have said the same words as you until.....
So just on 3 years and out of warranty......RMS failed, gearbox blows 1st and 2nd, header tank gone balistic. No doubts about it. This car is fast, furious and drop dead gorgious. But it is a heap of sh*t as far as its reliability. and Porche warranty and after sales service is pathetic!
I doub't I would ever buy another porker.
My bet is that most 996's will suffer some serious problem within 3 years....even if that just means a clutch going at 10k! From this experience the owner won't buy another. Result: Porsche will go down the tubes.
They better get their act together soon....
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.