fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Alignment Specs: Post ROW M030 install

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHAlignment Specs: Post ROW M030 install

Leading reported evidence

Install on my c2 it will need

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I believe that after the ROW is installed on my C2 it will need to have the alignment adjusted.

Alignment Specs: Post ROW M030 install
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Install on my c2 it will need' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install on my c2 it will need' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 13 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Set like

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If yours were off, and if they were set like that by the factory, it was a sure mistake.

Alignment Specs: Post ROW M030 install
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Install on my c2 it will need

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I believe that after the ROW is installed on my C2 it will need to have the alignment adjusted.

Alignment Specs: Post ROW M030 install

Set like

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If yours were off, and if they were set like that by the factory, it was a sure mistake.

Alignment Specs: Post ROW M030 install
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T112012Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I believe that after the ROW is installed on my C2 it will need to have the alignment adjusted. Two questions related to this: 1) Is the alignment spec differrent for the ROW versus the standard for a 2002 C2? 2) Can anyone post what the ROW spec should be? Thanks in advance, Gary Myersville, MD 18" Turbo Look Wheels Pirelli PZero N4 PSE (no switch) Twin Exhaust Tips

POST 2Original post

The only significant difference between USA and ROW M030 alignment specs is the front camber. USA front camber: 0� � 15' ROW M030 front camber: - 15' � 15' Not much of a difference, if you ask me.

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Viken, Thanks for the reply. Just to make sure I understand, when you say "USA" confirm your talking about the standard M030 or are you talking about the standard (read non M030) suspension? Thanks, Gary

POST 4Original post

USA alignment specs are the same for both standard and M030.

POST 5Original post

Factory alignment settings are just a baseline, they're not set in stone. Before my RoW M030 install, rear camber was 2.5 neg and fronts were 0. It's set this way by the factory to suit the lowest common denominator among Porsche drivers i.e. the ham-fisted idiot who will likely over-drive the car and get into trouble. My settings are now, rear: 1.5 degrees neg, front 1 degree neg. The balance now is good, it's a good compromise between street (low tire wear) and track needs (neutral handling).

POST 6Original post

That is not true. The factory wants to adhere to their specs per workshop manuals. If yours were off, and if they were set like that by the factory, it was a sure mistake. The 2.5 degree negative camber would chew-up the inner tread in a heartbeat if car is mostly driven on highways.

POST 7Original post

My tire (both track and street) wear seems to confirm fahren affair claim that the factory might have 0 camber in front and neg 2 to 2.5 at rear. Track tires: Wear even at rear Wear outer half at front Street tires: Wear inner half at rear wear even at front

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Good feedback guy's. Loren, Again you come through with the exact information needed, perfect!!!! Sorry for all the questions, just trying to understand the basics. Of course it is even more interesting to be able to hear the real world experience on the effects of different settings. Thanks, Gary

POST 11Original post

After all this talk I'm going for the ROW 30 on my C2 Cab. A bit off topic, but I am interested in what it will cost to have the ROW 30 install (less parts) and aligned by a dealer. TIA

POST 12Original post

I stand corrected. i pulled the labor ticket from Andial, and it states 1.5 neg rear camber (2.5 after it was lowered and before realignment). I still contend that factory settings make the car 'safe' not fast. It's meant to 'dumb-down' the car for the widest audience of owners/drivers most of which will never track their cars or want to extract to most from it. My current alignment was based on past experience from 10-yrs of bmwcca DEs and suggestions from rennlisters.

POST 13Original post

Sure, no one is arguing that. Factory settings are nowhere near ideal for any performance driving other than straight line. I believe the original question was asking for the factory settings and not the ideal ones for a specific type of driving.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.