fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Take care at the fuel pump

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHTake care at the fuel pump

Leading reported evidence

Fill car up

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

So I am standing there filling the car up with fuel minding my own business

Take care at the fuel pump

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

The idiot who filled his car up before I arrived obviosly didn't place the handle back in its

Take care at the fuel pump
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Fill car up' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Fill car up' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Fill car up

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

So I am standing there filling the car up with fuel minding my own business

Take care at the fuel pump

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

The idiot who filled his car up before I arrived obviosly didn't place the handle back in its

Take care at the fuel pump
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T163944Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

So I am standing there filling the car up with fuel minding my own business then whack!! The f...g fuel pump handle on the fuel pump next to mine jumped out of its holder and thwacked the side of my car. The result, a nice big ding in my drivers door. The idiot who filled his car up before I arrived obviosly didn't place the handle back in its holder properly. I sometimes wonder if all the hours I spend at weekends detailing my car is worth it. Before you ask, I have put in a claim at the fuel station......but I don't hold much hope. Is there anyone in the UK reading this with any legal knowledge who can tell me if I have a case here?

POST 2Original post

Paul I think it highly unlikely that you will be able to claim for this. I base my statement on the fact that the UK insurance system is apalling and more importantly useless. A van 'nudged' my rear a couple of months ago. It was hard enough to feel it inside the car and because his towing hook was the object that made contact with my rear bumper, my bumper split - otherwise I wouldn't even bother claiming. I took pictures of the van and my car, of the towing hook with red paint still on it and rolled th� car back to prove that the towing hook was completely lined up with the damage. My insurance company's response was: If there were no actual witnesses to the fact that the van hit you then we would not be hopeful of a claim. Nice.

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Yup, I thought as much. It's a real pain the proverbial. BTW, who is Paul? Cheers, Berny

POST 4Original post

sorry .... hopefully it can be pulled by the ding man.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.