12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHDon, You inspired me, I got the Eyes done
Leading reported evidence
Use edit function
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Also there seems to be no ability to use the edit function to post images, the only way is to type in one character at a time?
Leading evidence: 'Use edit function' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use edit function' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T005001Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
See pictures. The painter did a great match on the paint....
<img src="http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/Eyesfront2.jpq" alt=" - " />
<a href="http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/Eyesfront.jpg" target="_blank">http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/Eyesfront.jpg</a>
<a href="http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/Eyeright.jpg" target="_blank">http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/Eyeright.jpg</a>
<a href="http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/Eyeright.jpg" target="_blank">http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/Eyeright.jpg</a>
Looks good, welcome to the club! <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" /> The openings look different than mine... where did you get yours from. The ones shown here are from TechArt.
<img src="http://www.986host.com/albums/Sloth996/hr_Headlight_Bezel.jpg" alt=" - " />
<img src="http://www.986host.com/albums/Sloth996/Dsc00013.sized.jpg" alt=" - " />
Mom's C4 cab in FLY
<img src="http://www.986host.com/albums/Sloth996/Dsc00022.sized.jpg" alt=" - " />
I bought them off of ebay, They are suppose to be a Strosek model, but I could not confirm it. They fit exceptionally well though, actually overlap the edges of the light housing. There was no name on the parts, just some alphanumerics that I could not decifer....
How do you get pictures to post directly to this site, I haven't figured that out yet though I have tried the obvious stuff.....
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by Gretch:
<strong>
How do you get pictures to post directly to this site, I haven't figured that out yet though I have tried the obvious stuff.....</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">You mean like this???
<img src="http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/Eyesfront.jpg" alt=" - " />
Hit the post reply button, and in the buttons next to the graemlins you will see a button that says "IMAGE". Hit that button and place the web address into the box that appears.
So every image posted here is resident on a website somewhere?
Also there seems to be no ability to use the edit function to post images, the only way is to type in one character at a time?
I tried it with my first picture and the result was a red X in my first post.
Must be a simple mistake.....
Well Gretch, welcome to the headlight facelift club!
Who says men can't have a facelift! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" />
<img src="http://www.fototime.com/E357FC8FF0317DD/standard.jpg" alt=" - " />
I did a search and only fround one site that has them. They are referred to as version 1 of the headlight covers. What everybody else has above are called version 2.
<a href="http://www.essentialstyling.com/headlight_covers.htm" target="_blank">http://www.essentialstyling.com/headlight_covers.htm</a>
There are 3 covers I've found:
NR - <a href="http://www.nrauto.com/sub_index.asp?makeid=Porsche&spage=Accessory" target="_blank">Direct from NR</a> also from <a href="http://www.performanceproducts.com/ProductPage.aspx?ProductName=Performance+Headlight+Covers&productid=1045 87&producttype=20" target="_blank"> Performance Products </a>
TechArt - <a href="http://www.stuttgartperformance.com/exterior_products_986boxster_p2.html" target="_blank"> From Stuttgart Performance</a> The original TechArt page <a href="http://www.techart.de/Techart_Katalog%20996_Englisch/Headlight_panel.htm" target="_blank">TechArt</a>
Strosek - <a href="http://www.strosek.de/" target="_blank">Strosek Page</a> STROSEK Scheinwerferblenden. Don't have an online source.
They are all are at least a variation on the two hole version. I can't find a source for the ones I have anywhere. I sent the Essentials guy an email asking him who the manufacturer is. If I get an answer I will post it.
Here is a pair that is a lot cheaper than retail...If red is your color..
<a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2421536666&category=33654" target="_blank">http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2421536666&category=33654</a>
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
