9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHReliability Question
Leading reported evidence
Check leaks, etc
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
It is a ritual to constantly monitor oil level, pressure, temp, check for leaks, etc.
Leading evidence: 'Check leaks, etc' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check leaks, etc' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Servicing is-in fact-an oil change every 12k miles!
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
It is not a car where you just fill up the tank, change the oil and go.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T065735Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi All,
I am considering purchasing a 1999 996 C4 with about 30K miles. How is the reliability on these things? Anything in perticular to look out for?
TIA
Ray Bahr
I have a 99 with about the same mileage. The most important thing is to get a checkup from a qualified Porsche mechanic prior to your purchase. The difference in reliability has a lot to do with the quality of the auto when you get it.
I've had mine since February with no major problems. I have had some minor issues, but the warranty is still good so I get them fixed with that. Overall I'd say pretty reliable.
As far as comfort, it's my only car, and is as comfortable to me on long drives as my big-ol' Benz was (with the exception of the legroom for stretching).
All in all the most comfortable serious sports car that I've ever been in.
A 911 of any year is not about comfort and to a lesser extent, reliability. It is not a car where you just fill up the tank, change the oil and go.
It is a ritual to constantly monitor oil level, pressure, temp, check for leaks, etc.
You won't be running to Jiffy Lube for an oil change. In fact, an oil change will cost you about the same as a full service for a Honda.
If you are looking for a comfortable, reliable 4 season vehicle for your wife, why not a Volvo?
Well, I guess I should have defined comfort with all the 'purists' around. This is not intended as a track car - we have other cars for that. It will see spirited driving by both her and myself. We are looking at something that is a bit less 'raw' than the 993 or 964 models, something that is easy to drive long distances, and RELIABLE - which the current spate of Volvos does not seem to be (I was recently looking at the V70R as my practical car). I also want it to be safe and have some unique qualities to it. Her current car is the 225hp Audi TT which has been a reliability nightmare - in the shop for > 10 weeks this year...
Thanks for the info
Ray Bahr
I sympethise...why should Porsche be a by-word for uncomfortable and unreliable. Porsche's USP is that it is a useable supercar (unlike say a Ferrari 355 which needs belts changing etc). Servicing is-in fact-an oil change every 12k miles! My car doesnt need much more until 48k miles!
I do not want to spend �60k to punish myself! The 996 is a comfortable car but is quite noisey due to roar from its rear tyres. Also the steering tends to shimmy slightly (every Porsche I have ever had does this at high speed).
I find the 996 to be the most comfortable P-car I've ever driven. I drove an 85 911 and found it less than ideal for daily driving due to comfort issues, and my 944 is less comfortable than the 996. No idea how reliable the 996 will be - hoping I have a healthy car. No steering shimmies either.
If you stick with the stock suspension, I think the C4 is a very comfortable car, and so far my '00 has been quite reliable with no service interval less than one year. It does very well in the snow although most would suggest changing to a winter tire.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.