7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH19"Wheels+RoW M030??
Leading reported evidence
Replace maybe pay up
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I would go another way on wheels if you have the bug to change, maybe pay up for some really light 18".
Leading evidence: 'Replace maybe pay up' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace maybe pay up' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T120458Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
How harsh would the ride be?
Not usable as daily driver?
Usable but teeth shattering?
Not so bad?
This is for a C4 Cab in the Los Angeles area, driven about 2 hours/day on L.A. freeway system
The RoW M030 rides like the stock suspension...no worries there. Why the fixation on 19s? looks?? Potholes and the like will be an issue with 19s, whether or not you keep the suspension stock.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by fahren affair:
<strong>The RoW M030 rides like the stock suspension...no worries there. Why the fixation on 19s? looks?? Potholes and the like will be an issue with 19s, whether or not you keep the suspension stock.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">You're bu## must be less sensitive than mine.
IMHO, the ROWM030 is definitely firmer and rides more stiffly than stock on all but the smoothest roads. Having said that, it's in no way obectionable, and the improvement in handling is well worth the added harshness. It's a great upgrade. I completely agree with your comment re: the 19" wheels.
Or your tire inflation is too low...the RoW M030 is clearly harder than stock. I'm with Mike, it is worth it and not particularly objectionable, well short of a pure track setup. The parts are about 15% firmer, so is the ride.
I would go another way on wheels if you have the bug to change, maybe pay up for some really light 18". With a firmer suspension these will have more value, reduce some harshness from the rear over bigger bumps, improve the cornering on rougher pavement.
Thanks for your input guys.
I did want the 19s mainly for the looks, but if the light 18s work better with the firmer suspension, then I'll go with that.
Thanks Again.
NMoore,
I would be interested to know what would be considered "light" wheel. Would the OEM Turbo hollow wheel qualify for this or do you have after market wheels in mind?
I have been considering a wheel upgrae for my 02 C2 and also have been contemplating a suspension upgrade to the ROW M030. My impression of the standard suspension with 18" wheel ride quality is that it is already "harsh".
<img src="http://www2.direcpc.com/gb/jpg_blue6.jpg" alt=" - " />
Myersville, MD
18" Turbo Look II Wheels
Pirelli PZero N4
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
