10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH2001 996, 99K + miles, Loaded NAV...worth it?
Leading reported evidence
Replace ?)
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I see de-ambered lights (standard that year or replaced?).
Leading evidence: 'Replace ?)' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Inspect vehicle yourself and make sure you like it' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Inspect vehicle yourself and make sure you like it
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
A ppi would be good but still inspect the vehicle yourself and make sure you like it..
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T000231Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Is this machine worth it? What should I look for when I test drive it?
Thanks in advance.
Here it is:
Linky 2001 911, black/grey, loaded NAV
and a photo:
Looks like a pretty poor install on the aftermarket head unit, and probably needs the engine mounts replaced. Obviously it's a manual and not an automatic as the ad states. Personally, I'm not a fan of the wheels, but some may like it.
There's lots of threads out there, but the best thing to do is get a good pre-purchase inspection from a reputable porsche mechanic (or dealer). It'll be worth every penny.
C4 more valuable than a base model. Stated as loaded, with what? Get the options codes. I see painted center console. Does not look like full leather, especially at the doors. Does it have a leather dash? I see de-ambered lights (standard that year or replaced?). Looks real clean. If going to get the LN bearing, also do clutch. Negotiate that cost off the price? I see deviated carpet (standard is black?). Seats are the base leather.
It looks nice.. It has good price, its a C4 and exterior & interior look good. A ppi would be good but still inspect the vehicle yourself and make sure you like it.. Light color interiors seem to wear out faster than black ones.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
