11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHHow accurate are the Durametric Ignition Ranges?
Leading reported evidence
Replace values
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Worse, the read may change the values to let Porsche know the values have been accessed via an unauthorized tool.
Leading evidence: 'Replace values' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace values' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T113718Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I finally got around to plugging my Durametric up to the 996 and looked at it's ignition ranges, but the values don't seem right at all.
It lists 1770.4 operating hours, 8156/1725 range 1, and 315/1464.9 for range 2.
We don't have a good feel for hitting the rev limiter (range 1) other than the value seems really high. The over rev, on the other hand, we can think of maybe a handful of times each that we've had a bad downshift that could have caused an over rev (but most probably didn't). So maybe at worst accounting for not realizing we did it we should only be talking about 25.
This is a 1 owner car, the cluster is still original, the ECU hasn't been changed, one AutoX event, and no DEs yet. What else could explain these numbers since we know this car has not been subjected to the abuse these numbers imply?
Assuming the numbers are bogus then an explanation, rather just a theory, is the Durametric system does not read the over rev counters correctly.
As I have mentioned before these counters represent an avoidance of risk to Porsche.
The data must be (or should be) reliable, accurate, and tamper proof.
Thus a simple "read" of these values may not deliver the real values. Worse, the read may change the values to let Porsche know the values have been accessed via an unauthorized tool.
The approved method to read these is with a Porsche diagnostics computer. This computer is in contact with the factory. There can be some interaction between the reading of the data and some data at the factory that is used to derive the actual readings for public consumption.
This gives Porsche a way to keep tabs on when the numbers were read, that they were read via an approved way, and have not been "tampered" with in the meantime.
It also provides a way to detect if say the numbers were reduced or the higher numbers in the higher rev ranges were erased/zeroed.
Just a theory mind you. However, without say having the ability to read the numbers via an official Porsche diagnostics computer, then read them with a Durametric tool, then re-read them with a Porsche diagnostics computer to see if the before and after readings are ok and consistent, this is just a theory.
Yes I understand that there can be multiple hits within a single ignition cycle, but that is irrelevant in this case as even at 1:1 these numbers are way too high given that we intimately know the history of the car.
With that many ignitions in range 2 thats not an anomaly. If I see less than 20-30 ignitions I overlook it, but when its 10X that, its real.
Usually one zing thats really quick will count for 150 ignitions in range 2, one heavy over rev is usually around 300. This one was zinged once pretty good, or twice really quickly.
Durametric only reads the data, in this scenario its just as effective as any other diagnostic tool. To achieve a range 2 in an earlier car (that only has two ranges, not six) requires the engine to be mechanically over revved to 7,800 RPM+. This will only occur if a shift is missed and the vehicle speed and momentum is multiplied through the gearbox, "zinging" the engine to an RPM well beyond that the ECU rev limiter will allow.
Today on the track one of my engines was sent to a range 6 for 326 ignitions and lived through it. Its down a little on power as I am sure they bent all the valves, but it stayed together and running fine. It will have to come apart for good measure.
OK, I think I am misunderstanding the term "ignition" in this context. I thought it referred to a start/stop cycle, but your description leads me to believe I'm wrong. Can you (or anyone) please clarify?
It takes two revolutions of the engine for all six cylinders to fire, so there are three ignition events during every engine revolution.
If my math is correct, there are 370 ignition events every second at 7,400RPM.
Ok, I think I get it now thanks. Less than a second over 1700 hours seems much more in line with what we believe the car has seen in its life.
Thanks for all the info. Its much appreciated.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.