11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH"GT3 Touring" Ducktail Spoiler
Leading reported evidence
Test multiple versions and prints of the design
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I've tested multiple versions and prints of the design to hold up to >130mph (exact limits hard to reach as I don't have Autobahn access) and the extra stability is very felt!
Leading evidence: 'Test multiple versions and prints of the design' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test jig' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
While true, it's also way more brittle than straight ASA and we snapped the black print in question trying to uninstall it from the test jig.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I've tested multiple versions and prints of the design to hold up to >130mph (exact limits hard to reach as I don't have Autobahn access) and the extra stability is very felt!
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T174436Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hey folks!
@circuit.heart
here, had a bit of a process with Rennlist admins so I now have to post under a vendor account
since the original thread for the ArtnD 996 Touring spoiler has been nuked, I would like to announce in this new thread that development is 99% done and preorders are open!
https://artndvehiclestudio.com/produ...ouring-spoiler
Video is worth a thousand photos:
You Tube
Since I posted this on social media the reception has been insane, so I and my print partner picked up another Bambu farm to handle demand! We are at the last steps of optimization - the prints' precision, strength, and ease of install have been great and we're just dialing in our bonding and annealing to make sure there's no long-term shrinkage or expansion. Once we're confident in outputting consistent high quality, we'll start shipping customer units.
Some of the more frequent questions I've been receiving:
Does it come color-matched: Nope, these will ship in primer unless your car is close enough to my showroom (Milpitas, CA) that you can bring it in person. Color-matching would be an additional cost.
Does it fit Cabs: Yep
Does it fit Carrera 4S: Yep, see below
Install works exactly the same as the stock louvres besides suggesting you tuck the 4th brake wire under the motorized teatray for a cleaner look. I've tested multiple versions and prints of the design to hold up to >130mph (exact limits hard to reach as I don't have Autobahn access) and the extra stability is very felt!
Timeline-wise, we've received many preorders so there's a backlog already while we're still doing final quality work, but I think we can start shipping the first ones about 1-2 months from now. Introductory pricing is $695 + shipping. Let me know if you have any questions!
(saw answer in later post) Does it still go up/down -C4S here.
Another vendor here makes a LED kit that replaces all the back taillights, and it would look great (my opinion) if it had the 3rd brake light also.
comments?
YMMV
Quick update here as nothing's polished up enough for social media:
Ed and I have been trying things nonstop since we got to the 99% milestone, now we're trying to get the last 0.1% and of course that's the hardest part. With enough heat I was finally able to get our "99%" print to warp, and it does so in an unfortunately ugly way:
So I redesigned the underside of this section to have a stiffening rib, which doesn't eliminate the problem entirely but it at least makes the curvature of the thermal warp more controlled. We have also been fighting 1 or 2 of the joins between print sections "breathing" as they cure, which leads to, if you paint the part before it's done breathing, a very subtle crease in the final painted part.
With tweaks to our bonding slurry recipe and curing process we got this down to just a very subtle line showing up for about 1" in the latest part, but that's still unacceptable IMO. Haven't taken a photo of this because I actually can't see it on the camera (good news?).
What I
think
is happening is that this being a thin-shelled ASA print, there is internal tension between the layer lines and it's basically allowed to show up as we attack the ASA with both heat and thinners (in the paint). This has now led us down a rabbit hole of trying different filaments, drying recipes, and bonding methods to appease the printer gods.
ASA-CF was first up to bat given we know ASA well and the carbon version of the filament supposedly had much lower thermal expansion/contraction. While true, it's also way more brittle than straight ASA and we snapped the black print in question trying to uninstall it from the test jig. We then tried PC-ABS which seems to consistently warp itself off the bed, so it feels like it has even more internal stress than ASA; and if we can't print it, of course it won't work. We're now trying straight polycarbonate which will make us revisit the bonding recipe (can't just acetone slurry it). JB Weld just because I wanted to see what happens:
Turns out, over time JB Weld shrinks as well, so thank goodness we let one sit out forever otherwise we would've only found out through angry preorder customers. I am still considering using it though since if it shrinks, we could just let it cure for a long time before letting filler primer cover the miniscule gap.
If there's any silver lining it's that all this printer operations has developed our raw prints to be the best quality they've ever been. It saves a lot of post-processing time not needing to sand these guys much at all. Just knock down some of the difficult edges/steps after bonding and go straight to primer.
So that's where we are now - if you've preordered with us and are patiently waiting, we really appreciate that, and hopefully this gives some insight into what we've been doing the last few months. Long-term testing is super slow but when done thoroughly gives us confidence that our product will last as long as an OEM part does. Cheers!
Honestly, Id rather it be "10 minute Install, 20 years more RETRO". Ive been wanting one of those rear luggage racks that attach over the rear decklid for my 996 like on the old air-cooled cars.
Im envisioning one that is mounted level to the ground, with the rear mount taller than the front mount, so its up and out of the way when the speed activated spoiler raises up. It will go well with my factory Porsche RTS roof rack.
Can you design something like that? I would think it would be popular with the growing 911 rally/safari/overlanding crowd for just a bit more luggage space/options.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.