16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCarfax states vehicle stolen and recovered
Leading reported evidence
Clean history car
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
In $10-20k dollar car market, few thousand dollar difference won't make me budge, unless close to $10k difference, I would just stick with the clean history car.
Leading evidence: 'Clean history car' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean history car' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Unless they were running away from cops in high speed and crash, which typically get totaled/salvaged title.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Personally I know better and only use the Carfax report as PART of my due diligence.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Clean history car
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
In $10-20k dollar car market, few thousand dollar difference won't make me budge, unless close to $10k difference, I would just stick with the clean history car.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T130754Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I came across a car that has a vehicle stolen reported on the carfax and the car was recovered. Did talk to the owner and he stated that his house was burglarized and his 911 was stolen. He also states that he has the time he reported the missing car and 3 hours later the police found his car 3 blocks from his house. No abuse just missing car key
Is this an issue in the future?
Thanks
No insurance claim ? Get a notarized letter from the owner or a copy of the police report. If I liked the car and the PPI did not show over rev high counts. Why not ?
Here's my take.....
It's an issue in respect to the fact that the majority of those purchasing a used car rely on Carfax and many a car live or die by the history captured on a Carfax report. That history is not always accurate but the damage is done once it hits the Carfax report as many people stop after finding a "black mark" on the Carfax.
Personally I know better and only use the Carfax report as PART of my due diligence.
The other part of the equation is being able to verify the owner's story. Was the car damaged as a result of the alleged theft? Did his insurance company prepare an estimate for any theft related damages? Can or is the owner able to provide you with a copy of the police report pertaining to the theft so you can verify what he is claiming?
All questions I would want answered prior to moving forward. Keep in mind these same questions may come up again when and if you try to sell the car down the line.
Bottom line is that anything listed on a Carfax can be an obstacle when selling/buying a used car.
How in the world did that make it to CarFax, if the car was just stolen and driven for three blocks and recovered 3 hours later? Somthin's not right here.
+1
This goes way back 11 years ago, so not sure whether this is still the case or not.
One of my previous car had a front end collision, but the carfax report never showed a such incident.
I would consider the theft recovered vehicles as long as it didn't suffer through major damages, these vehicles typically suffer through broken glasses or ignition switch. Unless they were running away from cops in high speed and crash, which typically get totaled/salvaged title.
I think it depends on how long you plan to keep the car. If you tend to move on within a few years, you're going to have to explain to prospective buyers the story behind the blemish on the Carfax. On the other hand, if you tend to keep cars for long-terms (5 years or more), this should be less of an issue and this car might represent a good deal as you have a negotiation point for the purchase.
The farther you get away from the issue from a time perspective, the less people will be concerned with it.
Is the vehicle priced accordingly? I thought theft would only show up if the car was written off by the insurance company.
Regardless, I think any smudge on the vehicle history deserves a price reduction. Main argument is that if you have 2 identical cars, but one has the "theft" and the other doesn't, all other things being equal what would a car buyer choose?
It really comes down to the price tag.
There are few out there who bought a cheap branded/rebuilt title car and put effort in it to get it repaired to the highest standard, but it won't be easily recognized by the market. If my brother had a rebuilt/salvaged title car, I would definitely buy it from his hands, since I know the exact history of that vehicle.
In $10-20k dollar car market, few thousand dollar difference won't make me budge, unless close to $10k difference, I would just stick with the clean history car.
In $30-40k dollar car market, definitely more than $10k difference will only attract me. Otherwise, just stick with the clean title car.
That's just me...
$.02
Same... But then again, I had an sl500 that while in my possession was totalled because of a bumper crack and a broken grille (no joke). Bought it back for $1k, but had the hardest time selling it as no one believed my story even though I had photos to prove it and extensive history.
With that said, just because a car is "stolen" is it totalled out, or is there a criteria that must be followed to proceed with the marking of the title with this scarlet letter? I could imagine how the insurance company wouldn't be so willing to go ahead and pay you out because it was gone for 3 hours and no damage has been done (if that's the story).
No car is "totaled" just because it has been stolen. And no insurance company is going to give you even one penny for a car missing for 3 hours, unless there was damage caused during the theft.
As stated above, something is very fishy about this story.
This is getting interesting, so you bought it back for $1k and what price tag are you trying to sell with?
Just asking since you've mentioned that you are having hard time selling it.
Man, that's a pure profit of $3k right there! I'm sure you also got the replacement value of the vehicle when they totaled it.
BTW, just found this, punch in the VIN# to confirm:
https://www.nicb.org/theft_and_fraud_awareness/vincheck
Called dmv and check out there is no salvage/rebuilt title. He still owns the car. This was a year ago. Apparently there were no claim on the insurance from the owner I assumed. The title department states that since no insurance company filed a stolen car thru them, the title remains unchanged.
So I proceed
Thanks
I may be able to help. PM me with the VIN and I can do a search related to prior claims submitted to insurance companies. If an insurance claim was ever submitted I will know. Having said that, realize that all damages don't get reported to insurance companies for one reason or another.
Titles get washed by re-titling from one state to another. What may appear to be a clean title today may in fact have been branded salvage title in the past, though I'm not suggesting that is the case in this particular situation.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.