fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

NADA 2002 worth more than 2004?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHNADA 2002 worth more than 2004?

Leading reported evidence

Check current value of my 2002 carrera and according

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I was checking the current value of my 2002 Carrera and according to NADA when you plug in a 2002 Carrera w/62,500 vs.

Original post Read captured discussion
NADA 2002 worth more than 2004?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Check current value of my 2002 carrera and according' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check current value of my 2002 carrera and according' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check current value of my 2002 carrera and according

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I was checking the current value of my 2002 Carrera and according to NADA when you plug in a 2002 Carrera w/62,500 vs.

Original post Read captured discussion
NADA 2002 worth more than 2004?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T192637Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I was checking the current value of my 2002 Carrera and according to NADA when you plug in a 2002 Carrera w/62,500 vs. a 2004 Carrera w/62,500 and all the options are identical the 2002 comes up with a value $2-3K higher than the 2004. I thought this was a little odd. Any ideas as to why?

POST 2Original post

The only thing I can think of is lower annual mileage, but I wouldn't have thought that it would make more than $1k difference. I've been liking Black Book recently. What do you get when you plug in the numbers here? http://www.cudlautosmart.com/Researc...eInValues.aspx It doesn't let you specify options but they don't seems to make a significant difference in the used car value.

POST 3Original post

Probably not real, you should pull mannheim auction prices to get the true market value

POST 4Original post

What's the average miles per year now days? 12k or 10k miles? Try this: Keep your 2002 Carrera w/62,500 with the same value, but (a) 2004 Carrera w/42,500 considering 10k avg miles per year (b) 2004 Carrera w/38,500 considering 12k avg miles per year

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.