9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCameronTX's TechArt Wide Body Cab (pic)
Leading reported evidence
Test car (in fact
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
</font> <font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">The Techart widebody's been out MUCH longer than the 996 turbo cab test car (in fact, it was out before the 996 turbo altogether), if anything Porsche copied Techarts design.
Leading evidence: 'Test car (in fact' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test car (in fact' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Test car (in fact
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
</font> <font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">The Techart widebody's been out MUCH longer than the 996 turbo cab test car (in fact, it was out before the 996 turbo altogether), if anything Porsche copied Techarts design.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T161109Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
What colour is the cab next to it, Seal Grey...?
BTW, it looks like Techart copied the camouflage panels Porsche had on their Turbo Cab, while testing.
<img src="http://www.sportscartesting.com/Media/cache/6/6930_380x285.jpg" alt=" - " />
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">Originally posted by MetalSolid:
<strong>What colour is the cab next to it, Seal Grey...?
BTW, it looks like Techart copied the camouflage panels Porsche had on their Turbo Cab, while testing.
<img src="http://www.sportscartesting.com/Media/cache/6/6930_380x285.jpg" alt=" - " /></strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">The Techart widebody's been out MUCH longer than the 996 turbo cab test car (in fact, it was out before the 996 turbo altogether), if anything Porsche copied Techarts design.
Re Turbo Cab...it's too bad that Porsche and others didn't follow RUF's engineering. They managed to produce a Turbo Cab without having to widen the fenders and also did not have to add ugly scoops to the rear of the car. They found a way to reverse the rear grille "slats" to push more air into the vehicle.
Their Turbo Cab is clean and sleek...and has 520hp and has a base price of 215,000 Euros.
If Ruf can engineer a sleek looking Turbo, why can't Porsche?
<img src="http://www.986host.com/albums/doncapecod/RUF_Turbo_Cab.sized.jpg" alt=" - " />
<img src="http://www.986host.com/albums/doncapecod/RUf_Turbo_Cab_1.sized.jpg" alt=" - " />
<img src="http://www.986host.com/albums/doncapecod/RUF_Turbo_Cab_2.sized.jpg" alt=" - " />
<img src="http://www.986host.com/albums/doncapecod/RUF_Turbo_Cab_3.sized.jpg" alt=" - " />
<img src="http://www.986host.com/albums/doncapecod/RUF_Turbo_Cab_4.sized.jpg" alt=" - " />
Don, I couldn't agree with you more <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" /> ! But you don't have to go all the way to Germany....
<img src="http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/Marin2.jpg" alt=" - " /> ,
<img src="http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/Marin1.jpg" alt=" - " />
What Porsche's effort should look like, with minor changes to side intakes...
<img src="http://www.auto-wereld.com/tuning/plaatjes/porsche_techart1.jpg" alt=" - " />
<img src="http://www.auto-wereld.com/tuning/plaatjes/porsche_techart2.jpg" alt=" - " />
I suggest not uploading images to Rennlist, too slow.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
