fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

why has rennlist become SO SLLLOOWW?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHwhy has rennlist become SO SLLLOOWW?

Leading reported evidence

Replace on my end

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

And nothing changed on my end.???

why has rennlist become SO SLLLOOWW?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace on my end' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace on my end' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 8 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace on my end

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

And nothing changed on my end.???

why has rennlist become SO SLLLOOWW?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T200546Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

is there something wrong with our server?

POST 4Original post

I thought it was just me. Mannnn is it slow suddenly. Also, has anybody gotten the sign in to the auction site to work?

POST 5Original post

Working slow for me also....but better late at night

POST 6Original post

here's the answer from Jhon D. I made a copy from the 993 forum. Jhon D. says: Hi Folks.... First - yes - I wasn't actually playing with the servers, but rather the connection earlier today - as throughput was TERRIBLE!!!! What I found is that it isn't me or my ISPs, but rather the Slammer worm is taking a LOT of bandwidth through pokes into networks (ours included). Anyway - I'm as frustratated by all this as you are.... For that - and see the ADMIN announcement in the near future - I signed an agreement today to essentially double my network bandwidth into the Internet backbone. In the near future, you should see some vast improvements in the site speed; At the same time - I'm upgrading my internal network, servers, routers, hubs, etc. I think you'll like the enhancements that they offer - but it should nearly double my internal communications as I move to GB nets internally. Anyway - early last week I was dialed in on a 56Kbs connection - and things looked pretty good!!! This week - it has fallen off the map...?? And nothing changed on my end.??? I'm inclined to believe that it's not the site - but the communications that many ISPs are trying to deal with right now - but for that, I'll be upgrading this network in any event. You folks deserve the best - and by God, you are going to have the best.... Thanks for you support and patience..! John D.

POST 7Original post

I had noticed a change in speed when the first animated avatar's started being used. -and I surf through part of an OC3 line! I wonder if the novelty of the animation is worth slowing the load time of the pages; especially for the Rennlister's in other countries who may have slower connections and pay by the minute for their internet access.

POST 8Original post

Hey Scott...that sounds like a great idea. I've turned off the "show avatar" anyway.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.