fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Legal implications of dealer solicitations

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
5 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHLegal implications of dealer solicitations

Leading reported evidence

Run some expensive, yet unneccesary tests

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

from not collecting your co-payment or giving you a fee for letting him run some expensive, yet unneccesary tests.

Legal implications of dealer solicitations
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run some expensive, yet unneccesary tests' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run some expensive, yet unneccesary tests' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 5 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run some expensive, yet unneccesary tests

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

from not collecting your co-payment or giving you a fee for letting him run some expensive, yet unneccesary tests.

Legal implications of dealer solicitations
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T103553Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Is it illegal for a Porsche dealer to offer a day pass at the Porsche Driving Experience, just as a marketing scheme/enticement for potential buyers? What about doing the same for a "loyal" customer who has purchased a number of cars from the same dealer for the past 10 or so years? Physicians are NOT allowed to do "favors" for patients because of the anti-kickback rules. I wondered if car dealers were under some degree of scrutiny regarding such practices.

POST 2Original post

I've been the recipient of a driving school opportunity; I can't see how that would be illegal or even unethical... They clearly want to butter-me-up in the hope of getting future buisness and I have no problem with that! I think a dealer could flat-out give me a car if they wanted to without any concern of legality. But who knows, I also know nothing of the patent physician issue you've mentioned. If my doctor wants to spring for a round of golf, it's not very likely I'm going to feel obliged to give up my kidney because I want to give him the chance to pick up a little something extra from blue cross! I'm not sure I understand the concern... <img src="confused.gif" border="0">

POST 3Original post

Arthur, It is hard to believe I am actually responding to this but here goes... You are drawing an arguement that makes absolutely no sense what so ever. A car dealer can market to you how ever they choose, as long as they aren't misleading you. I remember the days when dealers would advertise that they would have free hotdogs and hamburgers to get people to come see their new models. The anti-kickback you mention in regards to Dr's is to prevent a Dr. from not collecting your co-payment or giving you a fee for letting him run some expensive, yet unneccesary tests. (I am sure there are other situations I haven't thought of as well). Ask any Dr. you know about the perks they get from pharmaceutical companies, makes a day at PDE seem pretty insignificant.

POST 4Original post

I think its a horrible thing and you should not take it. You should immediately send any passes you have recieved to me. Email me for my address as soon as possible!

POST 5Original post

I have to agree with Ed on this..... <img src="graemlins/roflmao.gif" border="0" alt="[hiha]" />

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.