17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHLeasing a '03
Leading reported evidence
Use not the base price
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use not the base price' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use msrp and the residual%' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Leasing companies use the MSRP and the residual% to get the residual value.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
My point is if they use the MSRP including options then it would be worth getting lots of options.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Plug in your numbers and see if they look good..on a 5 year Pcar I would use a reidual % of about 58 to 60%.
Use straight percentage of the selling price (including options)
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If the leasing company is using a straight percentage of the selling price (including options) to calculate the residual, it might be worth loading it up with options!
Use straight percentage of the selling price (including options)
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If the leasing company is using a straight percentage of the selling price (including options) to calculate the residual, it might be worth loading it up with options!
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm new to the forum and have been delighted with the wealth of information that is provided.
With this in consideration, I am debating on whether to lease a '03 Cab - being offerred at $860 mo/60 months, $7800 drive-off, 10k miles per year - or not.
Could anyone shed any light on if this is a "good" deal or not?
Any feedback would be appreciated!
What's the MSRP on that car? $7800 drive-off is sort of high. What's the sales tax and luxury tax, and fees included, and how much do they want you to put down? The monthly payment is actually not bad.
I agree with the notion that a big down payment is bad. I also think a 60 month lease is bad. Thats five years! Lease it for 36 or 39 months. Rates are not that different. Good Luck, you will be pleased with the car itself, Im sure.
Hello,
Here is a lease calculator.....
<a href="http://www.leaseguide.com/calc.htm" target="_blank">http://www.leaseguide.com/calc.htm</a>
Plug in your numbers and see if they look good..on a 5 year Pcar I would use a reidual % of about 58 to 60%. Hope this helps...
[quote]Originally posted by John Murray:
<strong>The residual factor for a 60 month lease with 10K miles per year is 51%
This is according to the latest Porsche Lease Program.</strong><hr></blockquote>
What is the residual for an '03 coupe on a 10K/yr 36 month lease? Is residual the same % on options as on base price?
Thanks.
See if the dealership will go any lower either on the monthly payments or on the downpayment. There is usually quite a lot of room for negotiation in new 911 prices, $3-4k or more sometimes. Please let us know how you do, I'm looking into leasing as well and would like to know what kind of payment is possible (as in, how low can they go?
)
It was mentioned on another thread that you hardly get anything back for options when you sell a car.
If the leasing company is using a straight percentage of the selling price (including options) to calculate the residual, it might be worth loading it up with options!
[quote]Originally posted by TestnDoc:
<strong>Leasing companies use the MSRP and the residual% to get the residual value. Trust me, YOU will be paying for the options you order!</strong><hr></blockquote>
Do you mean MSRP or the base price? My point is if they use the MSRP including options then it would be worth getting lots of options.
But come to think of it, when I leased an NSX a few years back I was told the CD changer option would be factored into the residual, but the keyless entry option wouldn't be (those are the ONLY TWO options available on an NSX BTW!). So for a Porsche probably most options will NOT become part of the residual.
My car has many options including full carbon package and extra leather stuff and the options were all residualized at the same percentage as the MSRP of the base car. The lease was with Chase but I believe that Porsche Finance does the same thing.
I think 18000rpm's point is that because the options get residualized at 60-70% it is potentially a better deal to load a lease guy with options than a purchased car, where on resale you will not get paid much for them.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.