10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHOctane Levels?
Leading reported evidence
Run cbr
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Run cbr' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust poorer gas' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I use 98 octane since, here in Europe, 98 octane is recommended by POrsche over the 95 octane that is also sold here.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Rather, the car will simply detune itself to adjust for the poorer gas.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I use 98 octane since, here in Europe, 98 octane is recommended by POrsche over the 95 octane that is also sold here.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I've always run 93 and the other day had to (or run out) put in 91...
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T074343Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
The highest octane level in the Phoenix area seems to be 91. Is that ok and are there any consequences since the Porsche recommendation is for a 94 octane level?
I use 98 octane since, here in Europe, 98 octane is recommended by POrsche over the 95 octane that is also sold here. Makes me wonder if the octane really matters as long as its above say... 91 octane?
My bike has a far more tighter engine with 4cil reving up to 13,000RPM and pumping 160HP from a just 1,000cc electronic fuel injection engine, and manufacturer only recommends just 95 oct. <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
Octane ratings are different in Europe. I believe a European 98 is equivalent to a US 93.
91 octane is still within the acceptable range for the 996. For optimum performanc, 93 is reccomemded. It will detune itself, essentially a slight change in timing, to handle 91 octane. Some claim to notice the difference, some not. But I do not believe 91 is detrimental to the engine.
Wilam,
As others have already noted, your car will run optimally on 94 octane gas. However, 91 octane will not cause the engine any harm. Rather, the car will simply detune itself to adjust for the poorer gas.
Although 91 octane is the best available gas at most stations in AZ and CA, 100 octane gas is available at certain 76 Stations. I blend 100 octane and 91 octane (approx 60% 100 and 40% 91) at my local 76 Station. It ain't cheap, but IMHO, it is well worth it. I definitely notice a difference, and I've read that a 5% hp/torque reduction is typical when using 91 octane vs. 94 octane.
You said you live in Phoenix. I have good news: The 76 Station at 5601 East Bell Road, at the intersection of 56th Street, sells 100 octane gas. Moreover, there are a half dozen other 76 Stations in AZ that also sell 100 octane gas. Check out the Station Locator engine at the 76 web site (www.76.com) for more info.
Good luck. <img src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" border="0" alt="[cheers]" />
Craig (L.A.)
I've always run 93 and the other day had to (or run out) put in 91... what a difference! The car flet significantly slower. I am now sworn on higher octane in these cars and am trying 94.
Thanks for the great info everyone. I saved this thread for future reference, as I may be moving to CA in June.
Anyone use the "octane boosters" you can buy at the auto part stores?
I've read and heard advice not to use those octane boosters; mixing lower with higher octane gas is prefered. Nevertheless, I usually take a bottle of 104+ to the track for use in an emergency. That goes back about 15 years to when a friend informed me that he could hear my engine pinging as I came through the corner he was working. I suspected topping up with some faulty gas that was labeled 92 octane. I put in a bottle of 104+ (went outside the track to buy it), and he reported that he heard no more pinging. That car was an '84 944; you'd probably never hear pinging in a 996 with it's modern octane sensor and automatic retuning.
104+ adds about 1-2 octane to pump gas according a test done by one of the major car mags some years back, mixed per the label. Adding more does not help, and it is NO substitute for race gas in highly tuned applications.
It also leaves a lot of orange combustion residue that is not readily removable, I used to use it in a modified 300ZX-TT a bit. Xylene, I think.
Read the recent label carefully, somewhere along the way they have dropped the octane claim and now refer to "reducing the engine's octane requirement," so it has sort of been re-positioned as a cleaner.
I blend in some 104.5 octane unleaded to 91, and also believe I feel the difference. Hear it too, at WOT. But 91 will only harm a dyno sheet, not the motor.
FWIW European fuel is rated by Research Octane Number (RON) alone, US fuel is the average of RON and Motor Octane Number (MON), which is 4-5 points lower.
well i run my cbr on 98...
hell i run everything on 98....its safer, more performance, sure it costs more (only 10-15% more than premium unleaded), still if you can afford a porsche
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.