11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHSlide In/Out Jack Stands
Leading reported evidence
Use pair
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
yes, i would use standard for the front and use a pair for the rear.
Leading evidence: 'Use pair' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use pair' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
yes, i would use standard for the front and use a pair for the rear.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I would probably use standard jack stands for the front because you lift front and back from the same rear jacking point.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T130754Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I've seen a thread on here about jack stands that work with a jack so the rear of the car can easily be placed on the stands. Once the car is in the air, you can side the jack out while keeping the stand in place. Does anyone know what i am talking about and can point me in the right direction on where to look for these.
Or Jackpoint jack stands
Jackpoint Jackstands demo on Corvette C5.wmv - YouTube
on Jay Leno's Garage
Skinned Knuckles: All About Jack Stands - Jay Leno's Garage - YouTube
[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:]
http://assets1.wordansassets.com/wvc-1353271178/wordansfiles/images/2012/11/18/170071/170071_popup.jpg
those jackpoint are a very cool idea, but geez... $300 for a jack? and since you would technically want to pair, that $600. At that point you might as well save a bit more and wait for the next harbor freight sale on their scissor lift
Gotcha. I would probably use standard jack stands for the front because you lift front and back from the same rear jacking point. A second set of these would be nice, but a little overkill, and as you said, kind of pricey.
yes, i would use standard for the front and use a pair for the rear. the price is a bit high, but i can justify it because it makes life easier and give me peace of mind.
Just FYI - Paid Rennlist members get them for $279/pair plus shipping. You can read about them on several threads here that may help your decision about whether or not they are worth it for you.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
