16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHcheck pricing on this one
Leading reported evidence
Clean 97 c2s
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I would but I just paid almost $60k for a very clean 97 c2s.
Leading evidence: 'Clean 97 c2s' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean 97 c2s' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T053112Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
<a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1846768368" target="_blank">http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1846768368</a>
is 996 pricing this low these days??? 39k for 99 c2?
TGH001, SO WHY DON'T YOU BUY IT? this kind of treads just p** me off <img src="graemlins/cussing.gif" border="0" alt="[grrrrrrr]" /> <img src="graemlins/cussing.gif" border="0" alt="[grrrrrrr]" /> take your flame somewhere else thanks. <img src="graemlins/soapbox.gif" border="0" alt="[soapbox]" />
I don't think the thread is a flame either, just economic fact about the 996 which is depreciating at Lincoln Continental rates
For my sake I hope prices keep falling so I will have the option of getting either a 993 or 996 for the same money in two years when the BMW is paid off
I wonder however what Porsche thinks about this turn of events. Will they go back to air cooled? Or maybe slash prices $10-$15k like we saw that year with the MB 500SL?
[quote]Originally posted by Shark01:
<strong>I wonder however what Porsche thinks about this turn of events. Will they go back to air cooled? Or maybe slash prices $10-$15k like we saw that year with the MB 500SL?</strong><hr></blockquote>
Not a chance of a price reduction. The dollar has rebounded a little from its lows of mid July vs the EURO, but it is still well below its 52 week high. Realistically, the currency fluctuation means that in EURO terms Porsche is selling cars today for 10% less than it did 12 months ago.
I see it three ways why TGH is so concerned with market values of the 996.
1. He's concerned of PAG's direction
2. He's glad he got his C2S and laughing his a$$ off
3. He want's to get one knowing it's a better performer then his car
4. IM0 I don't give a hoot about resale values- I drive for the pleasure of it and to this day(4 years and going) still love my darn car : ). Regards. Mike
[quote]Originally posted by 996FLT6:
<strong>...4. IM0 I don't give a hoot about resale values- I drive for the pleasure of it and to this day(4 years and going) still love my darn car : ). Regards. Mike</strong><hr></blockquote>
I'm with you!
I always wonder when people are buing Porsche (or any car I guess) and they ask advice, it seems that most important thing in the car is the future re-sell value? <img src="graemlins/c.gif" border="0" alt="[ouch]" />
I'd rather think if it looks & drives way I want etc!
Same thing with mods, I do mods because I like the way they make my Porsche look better or go faster/better. Not how much I'll lose or get money when (if I ever) I sell it.
Come one people!
Very surprised the car is selling at this price given that:
(1) its got 18" Turbo Twist wheels/rims; and
(2) its got a Tip transmission.
(3) CarFax checks out (only question is when is the CarFax dated?)
Even with this sort of mileage, this car should be selling at around 45K in a private-transaction.
Would rerun the CarFax, and question the owner on price.
Remember, if its too good to be true...
Regards.