fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Former 944 owner looking at an 03 C4S with new engine

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHFormer 944 owner looking at an 03 C4S with new engine

Reported or suspected cause

little overplayed honestly

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

I think the bearing issue is a little overplayed honestly, but not when it happens to you.

Former 944 owner looking at an 03 C4S with new engine
Frequently discussed work

Check then walk away

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Just remember its a Porsche, parts are expensive, labor is expensive, if you can't do the work yourself or write the check then walk away.

Former 944 owner looking at an 03 C4S with new engine
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'little overplayed honestly' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'little overplayed honestly' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check then walk away' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

Check then walk away

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Just remember its a Porsche, parts are expensive, labor is expensive, if you can't do the work yourself or write the check then walk away.

Former 944 owner looking at an 03 C4S with new engine

Replace every 40k

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I would vote for the replacement engine - I also have a 2004 C2 and had the LNE retrofit done at 75K miles - touching 80K miles now with no issues - but the LNE single row bearing is considered a service item and recommended to be replaced every 40k to 50k miles.

Former 944 owner looking at an 03 C4S with new engine
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check then walk away

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Just remember its a Porsche, parts are expensive, labor is expensive, if you can't do the work yourself or write the check then walk away.

Former 944 owner looking at an 03 C4S with new engine

Replace every 40k

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I would vote for the replacement engine - I also have a 2004 C2 and had the LNE retrofit done at 75K miles - touching 80K miles now with no issues - but the LNE single row bearing is considered a service item and recommended to be replaced every 40k to 50k miles.

Former 944 owner looking at an 03 C4S with new engine
Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

little overplayed honestly

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

I think the bearing issue is a little overplayed honestly, but not when it happens to you.

Former 944 owner looking at an 03 C4S with new engine
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T183130Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hey guys. I used to lurk here quite a bit back in my 944 days. Now that my kids are no longer babies I've been on the 996 prowl. I've come across an 03 C4S that was the victim of the dreaded IMS failure back in 2011. The car had 79k on the clock at the time. The owner bit the bullet and shelled out the $20K for a new engine, clutch. He's put 4k miles on it since. I'm curious what you guys think about this in terms of the relative lack of experience rates with the replacement engine. Also curious if you could tell from the engine part number whether or not its the one that cannot be retrofit or maintenance 60K miles from now. Engine part number was 996100995DX. Invoice he showed me states its an 05 build? I guess I'm wondering if I'm better off buying something with less than 60K that hasn't gone yet so I can get the retrofit, or do I go with the new engine that has also had a new clutch as well. Thoughts? Thanks in advance.

POST 3Original post

I just had a replacement engine installed in my 04 C4S after the original failed at 37k miles. I am extremely pleased as it feels like I have a brand new car. Other huge benefit is that the factory replacement engine includes all accessory parts except for the A/C compressor so all of the usual suspects for preventative replacement are taken care of. According to my dealer all Porsche provided replacement engines do have the larger IMS bearing. Failure rates are supposedly much, much lower. But the bearing is not a candidate for the LNE retrofit process. I would vote for the replacement engine - I also have a 2004 C2 and had the LNE retrofit done at 75K miles - touching 80K miles now with no issues - but the LNE single row bearing is considered a service item and recommended to be replaced every 40k to 50k miles. Good Luck.

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks for the info, guys. Yeah, the thought of having the new engine, seals, clutch and 60k mile maintenance items behind me is a big selling point. I just questioned whether, long-term, having an engine where the bearing can be maintenanced was/is a better answer. I will keep researching. Thanks for the feedback.

POST 5Original post

Sounds like an advantage to have the newer engine, unlike the old days when a replacement engine was a bad thing. I think the bearing issue is a little overplayed honestly, but not when it happens to you.

POST 6Original post

This car should fall under the re-imbursement claim in the Porsche class action suit. He needs to file first before he sells it. Maybe he will discount for you after that.

POST 7Original post

I miss my 944 but not fixing it all the time. The 996 is fun!

POST 8Original post

Quotes source post: 10430037

IMS... Vs. #2 rod bearing... 300+ vs. 135/225(951) No brainier, buy it! It's the modern version of the 951. Just remember its a Porsche, parts are expensive, labor is expensive, if you can't do the work yourself or write the check then walk away.

POST 9Original post

How is the car priced? Comparable to ones without a new engine?

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.