16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAero Package
Reported or suspected cause
change of body style
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
The problem is the change of body style for the nose in 2002
Leading evidence: 'change of body style' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'change of body style' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check us website and the difference is' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Sorry just checked the US website and the difference is that some kits are not available to the 2002 models.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The problem is the change of body style for the nose in 2002
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T212127Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
The factory aero kit for 02 is not available yet. But the Pre 02 Aero Cup wing & side skirt (rockers) works on the 02 996. The front bumper for the new GT3 will be available soon. For now, the new GT3 Cup car front bumper is available if you cannot wait.
See my photo album for photos... <img src="graemlins/roflmao.gif" border="0" alt="[hiha]" />
<a href="http://www.porsche.co.uk/models/911teq/default.htm" target="_blank">http://www.porsche.co.uk/models/911teq/default.htm</a>
Then click on exterior.
I dont see why it shouldnt be the same in the USA.
Regards
Sorry just checked the US website and the difference is that some kits are not available to the 2002 models.
However the turbo kit looks like it could be available to 2002 models.
Check this out and tell me what you think:
<a href="http://www.betterbodiesmotorsport.com/home.html" target="_blank">http://www.betterbodiesmotorsport.com/home.html</a>
Click on "Wings" and see the 996 and 911 Carrrea.
The model is a 2002 carrera with aerokit, tested in March issue of GT magazine.
It also includes a sweet lip spoiler.
<a href="http://www.us.porsche.com/national/models/911teq/exterior/heckspoiler.htm" target="_blank">http://www.us.porsche.com/national/models/911teq/exterior/heckspoiler.htm</a>
FWIW, this is the 2002 factory rear wing + factory side skirts on an 02 C4 Cab. More pics of the same on website.
<a href="http://www.986host.com/gallery/doncapecod" target="_blank">Don's Web Page</a>
Saw that same wing the other day at a dealership in yellow/black c2 coupe and looks quite nice. If I had only the money to buy that and the gt3 side flares plus front spoiler(my wife will kill me is the main reason). Regards. Mike
The price shown on the magazine was written as
Aerokit: �2333.
Obviously that is GBP.
No point converting, as the price is bound to be different in USA anyway.
According to the magazine, it comprises the front lip spoiler, side skirts and the wing.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
