7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAnybody hate those sunshades?
Leading reported evidence
Check sticker
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Check sticker' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check on the option package' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I had both of my sun shades replaced under warranty because the mirror doors would not stay opened fully.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T060112Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I was just sitting in my car today, and I realized how cheap looking the fake leather vinyl sunshades were. Why, for heavens' sake, would they put leather all over the place for the full leather package, but leave that vinyl sunshade? Alcantara would have been nice. Anybody replaced them? If so, with what?
I agree that the stock vinyl sun visors are cheap looking. I priced leather ones from Suncoast Porsche which usually has competitive prices and even they wanted something in the neighborhood of $250 EACH for them. After that, I decided I could live with the vinyl. <img src="graemlins/nono.gif" border="0" alt="[nono]" />
Mike
Thats one of those elusive options that dosent show up on the order deck, but is available. I had both of my sun shades replaced under warranty because the mirror doors would not stay opened fully. Hint, hint.
So they can charge additional $550 for leather visors, $300 for leather dome light surround, $300 for leather steering column, $1250 for leather steering wheel air bag cover, $400 for leather sills, $1200 leather A/B pillars/roof etc. You were expecting Porsche to include all that with your measly $4900 " Full Leather Package" that also REQUIRES the $3300 " Full Leather Interior " seating option ? Next thing you know , they will be throwing in the $10 worth of parts for footwell lighting instead of charging $750 for it.
They do charge quite a bit, don't they?
This did get me checking on the option package. Also checked the sticker on my car. Full Leather is listed as NC for the C4S. Wonder what that means. I always thought it meant the "Full Leather Option Package". Full leather option package INCLUDES leather sunvisors. Full leather seats do not. On the other hand, full leather option package also includes leather dashboard, among other things, found on the C4S. Hmmmmmm. Called the dealership, and my favorite salesman is not there today.
Hey, C4S owners. What kind of sunvisors do you have? <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
