fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

short shifter

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHshort shifter

Leading reported evidence

Install #1

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I installed #1 with some help from a friend who is great with this stuff....THE best mod you can do.

short shifter
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Install #1' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install #1' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 15 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Install #1 and think it is great

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I just installed #1 and think it is great.

short shifter
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Install #1

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I installed #1 with some help from a friend who is great with this stuff....THE best mod you can do.

short shifter

Install #1 and think it is great

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I just installed #1 and think it is great.

short shifter
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T194705Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I'm sure this has been covered a thousand times, but if you wanted to get a short shifter for a 2001 996, which of the following would you get ( http://e-partssales.com/Merchant2/me...ode=996Trans): 1. B&M short shifter 2. Porsche Factory Short Shift Kit 3. 997 Shift Console Upgrade Thanks!

POST 2Original post

#3 I have it, I was told too bad I didnt know how great it was compared to the others but I can tell you it's GREAT !!

POST 4Original post

I have #1, but don't have anything to compare it to. I don't hear too much about #2, but have heard good things recently about the smoothness of #3. The only knock is the throw travel is longer than a short shifter, but still a little shorter than a stock 996.

POST 5Original post

maybe i'm throwing disinformation around, but i thought i had heard that B&M SS OEM provider of the Porsche SSK. So, in effect, #1 and #2 are the same.

POST 7Original post

#1 & #2 are one of the same except #2 is 2 bills larger.

POST 8Original post

I believe #1 and #2 were the same on the 996 but I recall reading that the 997 short shifter was different from the B&M shifter.

POST 9Original post

Quotes source post: 6547042

I, too, have #1 and it is supposed to be identical to #2. I've heard that #3 is smoother than #1/2 and most people switch ffrom #1/2 because it is too stiff. I love the B&M kit, the stock throws were so long and sloppy. It does take a few minutes for the car to warm up and the shifter to loosen.

POST 10Original post

1 & 2 are the same. Get the B&M and save some $$$, best bang for your buck mod. Best place to buy is: http://www.bumperplugs.com/BPindex.html

POST 11Original post

I just installed #1 and think it is great. It took a few minutes to get user to the "stiffer" feel, but now that I am used to it...nice!

POST 13Original post

I have #1 and I love. Recently installed it myself.

POST 14Original post

I installed #1 with some help from a friend who is great with this stuff....THE best mod you can do. It's fantastic. Good luck. j

POST 15Original post

#1 just installed mine..never go back to stock

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.