61 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHMy mechanic is stumped. Need help from Rennlisters Please.........
Reported or suspected cause
1 wire in a harness above the transmission casing
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause · Original poster
The culprit was 1 wire in a harness above the transmission casing that seemed to be somewhat chewed by a rodent.
My mechanic is stumped. Need help from Rennlisters Please.........
Frequently discussed work
Check any horizontal play in the crankshaft
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Just a suggestion here but as you have already changed the CPS and you are still having the same problem, have you checked for any horizontal play in the crankshaft?
My mechanic is stumped. Need help from Rennlisters Please.........
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: '1 wire in a harness above the transmission casing' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is '1 wire in a harness above the transmission casing' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check any horizontal play in the crankshaft' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
Rats are a more common problem than you'd expect - heard of another vario-cam error that turned out to be rat chewed sensor wires.
My mechanic is stumped. Need help from Rennlisters Please.........
Replace still doing the same thing
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Still doing the same thing after the second sensor was replaced.
My mechanic is stumped. Need help from Rennlisters Please.........
Replace today
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
My mechanic is stumped. Need help from Rennlisters Please.........
crank sensor
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause · Original poster
My mechanic which has over 20 years experience with P-cars originally thought it was the crank sensor.
My mechanic is stumped. Need help from Rennlisters Please.........
Frequently discussed actions (10)
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check any horizontal play in the crankshaft
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Just a suggestion here but as you have already changed the CPS and you are still having the same problem, have you checked for any horizontal play in the crankshaft?
My mechanic is stumped. Need help from Rennlisters Please.........
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
61 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
After 2 months & $9,500 worth of work including 50+ hours of labor/diagnostics the problem has been solved.
2003 c2 6mt w/ 41k on the clock.
First the car would die at idle sitting at a light . After a minute it would start back up and go with no issues. This happened once a day for three days.
On the fourth day the RPM's at idle would start to fluctuate between 700 and 1300.
This would go on for about a minute and then power would start to cut in and out while in gear at cruising speed and then die. Check engine light would come on at this point.
After a minute would start back up.
This would always happen about 10 minutes after initial start or right about when it got to operating temp.
My mechanic which has over 20 years experience with P-cars originally thought it was the crank sensor. Replaced it and reset the codes.
Picked up the car and went for a fairly spirited drive that evening redlining first three gears a few times. Car felt great with no problems whatsoever.
On the drive to work the next day same thing happened again! Rough idle, engine cuts out, check engine light comes on. Went back to shop and they're trying to figure it out.
The hourly rate for diagnosis is killing me!!!!!!!
Has this happened to anyone before. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated......
had similar - not exact problem - long story short it was this rubber that was slightly off - had been sucked in by intake (see photo where I'm pointing w screw driver) - and thus it was getting too much air, giving readings about vario cam timing being off (very hard to really happen) and causing stall at low speed/idle but fine aboe 2k rpm. hope it helps. can reach it without engine drop altho that's the only way we found it. ie the part of the intake behind the plenum.
Good post above.
Yuo might need to check the wire continuity to the crank sensor?
Only suggesting because the car ran great for a time then symptoms reaccured.
Best of luck,
Paul
also check your fuel, I'd say run the tank off , add some additive like techron
and fill her up at a reputable gas station that see decent amount of traffic (gas not sitting).
I had some idle problem once when I made a bad fillup at a not so great gas station.
Just a suggestion here but as you have already changed the CPS and you are still having the same problem, have you checked for any horizontal play in the crankshaft? <just a thought>
********Update******
Timing was consistently off with cam and cranks sensor error codes. Conensus is the IMS is about gone. Hopefully no engine damage is done but we obviously won't know until he opens it up. Luckily I bought a warranty for the engine when I got the car a year ago. New bearing from LN has been ordered. I will have to pay for the difference in price and shop supplies which is not that much. Fingers crossed on the condition of the motor.
It sounds alot like what I said above. You'll be ok. Look at engine carefully re intake etc... B4 opening anything. I think you can see that sheath w/o paying 4 hrs for the drop.
I'm not quite sure as well. Maybe another member can shed some light on the subject.
Meanwhile the work begins today and as long as things go according to plan I should have it back Friday. It's been 3 weeks and I really miss her. Yesterday I was on youtube listening to different porsche exhausts. Nothing beats the growl of a flat 6!
It would have been interesting/helpful to know the error codes.
IMS/IMS bearing is often the diagnosis but it may not be the right one.
A VarioCam solenoid/actuator can go bad and cause the symptoms you describe. Absent any noise of the marbles in a can and absent any signs of bearing failure in the oil filter housing oil and the filter element...
It is hard to imagine a real bad IMS bearing lasting as long as it did.
I'm also having a hard time imagining how a failing IMS could account for a cam timing variability.
While it is true the crank drives the IMS (via a chain) and the IMS drives the exhaust cams (again via chains) and the exhaust cams in turn drive the intake cams (chains again) unless a chain becomes so loose as the jump/skip a tooth the timing should not be adversely affected.
What can affect cam timing though is if the solenoid (or actuator) fails. The DME adjusts the intake cam timing and then fails to detect the desired timing from the cam position sensors. Assuming the sensors are not bad (there are tests for this) the DME will log one or more error codes pertaining to cam timing.
The engine will continue to run though it can run rough, experience a hunting idle -- in the case of my Boxster which went through this the rpms dropped to around 500 then climbed again and repeated this for as long (not long) as I let the engine idle.
If the failure is a hard failure (compared to as was the case in my Boxster an intermittent failure -- after shutting off the engine, and clearing the error codes the engine started and ran just fine afterwards but I had it in to have the symptoms diagnosed and the engine repaired without any delay -- the engine may stumble or even die as the DME attempts to change the fueling to try to bring the O2 sensor readings into an acceptable range and gets the fueling too far out of whack.
Anyhow, just my two cents (or less) worth.
Sincerely,
Macster.
Thanks for the info. I printed your post and passed it along to the shop manager. Mechanics can be a little sensitive sometimes. Here are some pics from my visit yesterday.
Well it looks like the shop already got stuck into doing as they wish to your engine and whatever they say needs replacing will get replaced. Good job you have a warranty out on it. I think your warranty people will be involved and giving the go ahead with new parts or reconditioned ones. With any luck you just might finish up with a totally rebuilt engine even though it might have only been a simple thing as Macster suggested like a failed actuater. Would be nice for you to get hold of any old parts that they change so you can inspect the damage. Like the dreaded XXX bearing if it was changed. Anyway enjoy your new car to the fullest.
Under no circumstances is this an IMS failure. Please post the codes (ask the mechanic to just write down the numbers, we'll take it from there.) Without the codes there are just to many suspects.
I stopped by the shop yesterday to see what the status was.
He did say that it wasn't just error codes but that the timing was actually off which I saw for myself.
Got there just as they were pulling the trans off and you could also see the area around the bearing enclosure definitely had seepage. Here's a pic....................
The way I see it is that if its something else he'll find it and in the mean time I'm getting the new LN Bearing for free.
Not trying to be your long distance mechanic, just offering my thoughts on the situation. My comments are meant to provide you with some discussion points that a mechanic worthy of the name should be willing to discuss with you to your satisfaction.
I can't recall if this has been done but it not removing the oil filter housing and carefully dumping its contents into a *clean* drain pan and looking at the oil and the filter element can help one determine what's going on.
If the IMSB is going bad there will be signs of this in the filter oil and element.
But you must be sure the drain pan is *clean* *clean* *clean*. A false positive at this stage can be an expensive mistake.
Sincerely,
Macster.
Check for debris in oil.
How was cam timing shown to be off?
We check for position of CAM slots relative to valve cover alignment by removing the cam plugs.
If off then we pull the scavenge pump covers and inspect the cam locking bolts.
This can all be done with engine in the car -- heck so can the IMSR.
You can also pull the valve covers and inspect the cam chain rails, if one of those
broke or chipped off, it would affect one sides timing.
You can get one side if the IMS to one bank chain jumped.
The only way to get both sides off is if the Crank to IMS changed relative position.
We had 99 Boxster have the IMS sprocket slip, but I'm told that is only known
to have happened on bicycle chain IMS's which were phased out somewhere around
99-2000.
It is also possible that your timing chain tensioner wasn't working properly and you jumped a tooth,
this would knock both sides off. However I would not think that it would have gotten better
with just changing the CPS.
Note it is possible that it jumped one tooth before (maybe bad -- but not catastrophic??) -- and now has jumped more than one tooth.
Love to know the end result.
thanks,
mike
Not a fan of aftermarket warranties??? I paid $2250 for a great warranty that my buddy sold me at his cost and EFG Warranty has paid out $5800 in claims so far. The last one was an arm wrestle for the vario cam actuator and selinoid but I won and there are 2 years to go plus almost 25K miles left on it.
this comment made my lump come up. I thought you were saying the LNE bearing failed and they were going to send you a new one.
You dont have an LNE bearing and you are saying the ins company is going to do one.
Just clearifing for other people who skim the post and dont read it from cover to cover.
Boy were you guys right. IMS replaced and engine is still cutting out.
Finally got the error codes.
P0335 Engine Speed Sensor Signal – Open Circuit
P0341 Camshaft Position Sensor 1 - Signal Implausible, Short to Ground, Short to B+
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Replacing the crank sensor was the correct first move (based on time and expense.) Next I would go over the wiring very carefully. Ground faults, anywhere it looks like it rubbed, contact points. Beat on the connectors. Cam sensors are next. I just can't believe it's the DME. The durametric can yield engine timing waveforms which definitively diagnose which sensor has failed. Outside chance the crankshaft timing pulley needs to be torqued. Go back over all the connections to all the sensors. Beat on them until they start working. Or at least threaten them until they behave.
P0335
Engine Speed Sensor Signal � Open Circuit
Possible fault cause
♦ Corrosion in the connector
♦ Open circuit or short circuit in the wiring harness
♦ Rpm/crankshaft position sensor faulty.
♦ DME control module faulty
P0341
112 Camshaft position sensor 1 - signal implausible
Possible fault cause
♦ Loose contact
♦ Camshaft position sensor
I'm no expert in these things but I beleive the Durametric can tell you the history of the voltage these items are receiving. There have been other threads about chafed wiring causing similar symptoms. From what I've read, it's quite simple to diagnose if you have access to the Parametric or Porsche diagnostic equipment.
Pull the connector off the DME and arm yourself with a DVM, trace continuity and short to ground or 12V back to the harness connectors in the engine compartment. If that checks out, trace from the engine side of the harness connector to the sensor.
Shouldn't be that difficult to find.
I'm hoping as well. Still doing the same thing after the second sensor was replaced. Checking voltage and all grounds at the moment. Waiting to here back. This is getting very frustrating to say the least! I'll stop by the shop tomorrow to see whats up.
***UPDATE***
After doing several tests with various parts of the electrical system they noticed a spike in AC current
right before the engine would cut out while driving. Consensus is the diode within alternator is bad.
Alternator is being replaced today.....
After 2 months & $9,500 worth of work including 50+ hours of labor/diagnostics the problem has been solved. Fortunately the warranty covered the majority of it. The culprit was 1 wire in a harness above the transmission casing that seemed to be somewhat chewed by a rodent.
Looking on the bright side I have an IMS upgrade from LN, new clutch, new alternator, & several new sensors. Picking it up later this afternoon.
I'm more excited now than I was when I first bought it!!!!!
Awesome! Your patience is rewarded. Rats are a more common problem than you'd expect - heard of another vario-cam error that turned out to be rat chewed sensor wires.
Probably didn't make much difference. A shop that gets a rep for padding the warranty work will have a tougher battle with the warranty company adjuster in the future approving warranty claims.
The shop has gone to the well now for a lot of money and my guess is this will hurt over time its bottom line more than this job helped its bottom line.
Sincerely,
Macster.
Thanks for the update.
As good as any place to put this: While you'll get a lot of ideas, and some really good ideas, about what may be wrong with a car from here and other sites, it really takes someone at the car with sharp eyes, ears and a nose and experience to troubleshoot some problems.
Just to reinforce this: Anytime a car comes in with a problem out of the blue if the car sits unused for any length of time rodent damage has to be suspect. 'course, in your case this bit of sage advice comes too late.
Sincerely,
Macster.
Thanks for all of the suggestions guys.
After 2 days of very spirited driving I have fallen back in love with it.
Clutch is silky smooth and motor runs and sounds fantastic!
There were times during the last 2 months when I was seriously considering selling the car as soon as I got it back. I looked at a couple of certified 997's. That's still going to be the next move but not until next year at least. For now I'm just going to enjoy it.
I am mailing this thread to my Porsche service department. My 2011 Cayman S is currently in the shop for cam position error. Let's see if he can get it on one try . And thank you all for the excellent diagnosis. $9500 indeed.