fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

28 mpg averaging 74 mph

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
33 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH28 mpg averaging 74 mph

Leading reported evidence

Fill cars

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Also, the nozzle auto shut off can vary from nozzle to nozzle but I have found I'm able to get pretty consistent shut offs by turning the nozzle nearly upside down when filling my cars with gasoline.

28 mpg averaging 74 mph
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Fill cars' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Fill cars' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 33 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 4 other evidence results

Fill tank is

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

My technique is to after filling the tank is to get in the car and start the engine and write down all the data: odometer, trip odometer, mpg, range, and average speed.

28 mpg averaging 74 mph

Reset fuel mileage while

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If I reset the fuel mileage while under way on the highway the reading can benefit to the tune of several milers per gallon easy.

28 mpg averaging 74 mph

Run 13:1 highly modified generation 3 fsi

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

This was able to net us the maximum MPG for the trip @ 27 MPG and that was running a 13:1 highly modified generation 3 FSI test engine.

28 mpg averaging 74 mph

Run cabin vent fan and the head/tail lights

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Oh, what appears to be a goodly amount of parasitic load is the electrical power required to run the cabin vent fan and the head/tail lights.

28 mpg averaging 74 mph
Frequently discussed actions (10)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Fill cars

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Also, the nozzle auto shut off can vary from nozzle to nozzle but I have found I'm able to get pretty consistent shut offs by turning the nozzle nearly upside down when filling my cars with gasoline.

28 mpg averaging 74 mph

Fill tank is

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

My technique is to after filling the tank is to get in the car and start the engine and write down all the data: odometer, trip odometer, mpg, range, and average speed.

28 mpg averaging 74 mph

Reset fuel mileage while

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If I reset the fuel mileage while under way on the highway the reading can benefit to the tune of several milers per gallon easy.

28 mpg averaging 74 mph

Run 13:1 highly modified generation 3 fsi

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

This was able to net us the maximum MPG for the trip @ 27 MPG and that was running a 13:1 highly modified generation 3 FSI test engine.

28 mpg averaging 74 mph

Run cabin vent fan and the head/tail lights

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Oh, what appears to be a goodly amount of parasitic load is the electrical power required to run the cabin vent fan and the head/tail lights.

28 mpg averaging 74 mph

Run hard through the plains

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

One leg of the trip we averaged 89 MPH for the majority of one tank of fuel when running hard through the plains.

28 mpg averaging 74 mph

Run into alberta canada

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I just completed a 6,788 mile R&D test run into Alberta Canada from Georgia.

28 mpg averaging 74 mph

Run oe tire sizes though

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I have always run the OE tire sizes though but I do run the tires the rear tires especially down to the wear bars.

28 mpg averaging 74 mph

Run tires the rear tires especially down

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I have always run the OE tire sizes though but I do run the tires the rear tires especially down to the wear bars.

28 mpg averaging 74 mph

Set cruise control at 75 mph or even 65 mph

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Try this: Go on a long stretch of flat highway, zero out the mpg and set the cruise control at 75 mph or even 65 mph.

28 mpg averaging 74 mph
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

33 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T020439Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Who needs a hybrid? Driving 95 miles and not "gunning it" in anyway shape or form, I got 28 mpg with my X51 C4S as shown in the pic. The trip computer stated a 74 mph average for that highway drive. Note, however, that I was driving the middle or right lane since averaging 74 mph in CT and MA on a Sunday is slow . People were blowing by me on the left lane. To see what the mpg would do if I downshifted into 3rd, it dropped to somewhere in the low 27's mpg just for that short mash on the gas.

POST 2Original post

How did you attain that mpg? My best is 24.3 mpg and I'm happy with that on the highway.

POST 3Original post

Mine will hit 30mpg (03 C4 Cab). My 03 C4S from a while ago would easily do 34 (I have pictures somewhere). I love my Econobox Porsche

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 9902047

I stopped to get gas, filled it up, zero-ed out the mpg and mph, went on the highway and left it in 6th gear.

POST 5Original post

That is pretty good I got averaged about 26.5 on way from Miami to Daytona last year but there might have been several instances where "possibly" I was going much faster than 74mph

POST 6Original post

I got 26.8 on my trip from Detroit to Charlotte thru the mountains, but, admittedly, I was in the right lane doing seven over after my speeding ticket in Detroit!

POST 7Original post

I can get in the 32+ range on all-highway driving (2004 C2 Cab). I'm not a super aggressive driver, but that's averaging 75 - 80mph on the mean streets of New England.

POST 8Original post

I've been averaging 27.8 the past 3 tank fills. It is an amazing car!

POST 9Original post

You're obviously not enjoying the car enough! Stop with this fuel economy obsession!

POST 10Original post

I guess I'm doing something wrong.. i only get 20mpg going 85mph the whole way

POST 11Original post

Might try getting a rough estimate of speedometer error. Drive the hwy, zero the trip odometer at a mile marker, start your travelling watching the mile markers. Calculate the error bouncing the trip meter off the total miles travelled in mile markers. Not totally accurate but you'll get a good rough idea arriving at the first mile marker travelled. I'm registering 0.8 mile odometer at the first mile marker. This figures to calculate gas mileage divide odometer by 0.8 to get actual miles travelled. Then divide by gallon (liters) filled. Bad news is I'm one of the low 20's or 18's mpg suffer's and it's a pretty new porsche rebuild. For you guys with high mileage it might be a case of smaller than standard diameter tires registering higher miles than actually travelled.

POST 12Original post

Hi. Maybe its the petrol that you guys have in the states but my 99 c2 will give me c34.4 mpg @ 70 mph When i first got the car i wanted to see ho efficienti could drive. I drove 126 miles brighton to dartford and back with some stop and go traffic and got 36 mpg average. Jack

POST 13Original post

You're right. There is a big difference in the size of a gallon UK-US. I didn't think of that till I realized you guys are not in the states. 10 UK gallons = 12 US. In Hawaii we have super lousy ethanol.

POST 14 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 9903685

Not a tire issue. I think you have a heavy foot issue... Try this: Go on a long stretch of flat highway, zero out the mpg and set the cruise control at 75 mph or even 65 mph. Then see what your mpg says. If it's not in the mid to high 20's then something may be wrong.

POST 15Original post

OK I bit my tongue long enough WHAT THE H&LL is this a hyper mile - prius forum!! I want to hear, I got 6 mpg and went through a tank of gas by lunch - I mean OK we know they "can" get good milage but you are NOT helping your car - those three letters everyone hates to talk about need to be driven...spun up, worked, and your piston tops need the same thing - all this putting about at 2k rpm is killing your motors - and my spirit!! GO DRIVE THEM - red line is not an option, it is a daily event - many times - many many times - daily! try that thing between the seats...use one number closer to (0) than (6) ARG - these threads are SOOO boring!!

POST 16Original post

My 996 gets 6 MPG and I fill up on a daily basis.. you guys are lame When driving my Cayenne I need a KC-135 Tanker for support.

POST 18Original post

Quotes source post: 9902004

Highway, Autobahn, was ~25 MPG in spring of '01. Wife was along so TOP speed wasn't always "available". The thing that really amazed me was the number of motorcycles that blew by us even when pushing the limit.

POST 19 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Ok, I'll bite. As per my avatar speed indication, the mpg was roughly 9 mpg. And yes, that was our actual speedo shot.... my wife was driving and I took the picture... This was on the autobahn. Also, 11 mpg at Monticello track.

POST 20Original post

Quotes source post: 9904021

ivangene, I'm with you!

POST 21Original post

On one of my most boring rides ever I managed to get more than 29mpg... 8 l/100km = 29.4 mpg (US) I won't do it again I promise!

POST 22Original post

you got that right - I didnt wait 30 years to get a Porsche so I could get 29 MPG !! (not saying it doesnt happen - just that it's embarrassing to admit)

POST 23Original post

I just completed a 6,788 mile R&D test run into Alberta Canada from Georgia. One leg of the trip we averaged 89 MPH for the majority of one tank of fuel when running hard through the plains. This was able to net us the maximum MPG for the trip @ 27 MPG and that was running a 13:1 highly modified generation 3 FSI test engine. Time and time again we see that higher speeds are conducive to higher MPG with these vehicles, even when making 100HP more than factory power.

POST 24Original post

In my 04 Gt3 I used to get 28.3 driving the 55 miles to the track at 75-85 mph and then it would drop to 8 mpg for the track driving.

POST 25Original post

Quotes source post: 9912916

Sounds like a 40 mph tail wind to me

POST 26Original post

Quotes source post: 9902392

That's conjecture and hearsay. Allegations of this sort will never stand up in court.

POST 27Original post

Quotes source post: 9902047

Gasoline with no ethanol. I got 27-28mpg in my 02 C4s going about 75mpg coming back from minnesota earlier this year.

POST 28Original post

Quotes source post: 9903685

With both of my Porsche and a few other cars while the speedo can be off -- reading optimistic from 2mph (Turbo) to 5mph (Boxster) the odometer is spot on. I have always run the OE tire sizes though but I do run the tires the rear tires especially down to the wear bars. I might note the speedo error remains consistent even as the tires wear. Fuel mileage measuring is tricky. In my Turbo -- which has an onboard computer and I can monitor fuel mileage as I drive -- even a bit of town driving before heading out on the highway can take mles to recover from compared to immediately easing my way directly out on the highway. Hills and head wind and traffic -- slowing down for slower cars and speeding up again to the limit once clear of slower traffic -- all work to affect gas mleage. I just try to pick a consistent starting from a fill up technique so my numbers are as consistant as they can be. My technique is to after filling the tank is to get in the car and start the engine and write down all the data: odometer, trip odometer, mpg, range, and average speed. Then I reset this info and head out. If I reset the fuel mileage while under way on the highway the reading can benefit to the tune of several milers per gallon easy. Also, the nozzle auto shut off can vary from nozzle to nozzle but I have found I'm able to get pretty consistent shut offs by turning the nozzle nearly upside down when filling my cars with gasoline. Sincerely, Macster.

POST 29Original post

No matter what Ed says, I think it's Perfect to have a car with the performance to get 8-13 mpg at a track event, then get 27-30 on the highway. When I bought this Porsche, I was tempted by several cars with fire-breathing, large engines....but was irritated by fuel guages that tried to race the speedometers. (Now if only the economy would turn around so the State of Washington would repair its highways so I wouldn't be considering selling my Porsche for a car with a more pliant suspension....)

POST 30Original post

LOL James - what kind of mialage you get out of that plane of yours....I bet its quite a bit more than most fuel guages that tried to race the speedometers. FUNNY!!

POST 31Original post

I'm getting about 15 in the city, 19 on the highway. Could be low because the of Super-Charger! Not sure about ethanol in my gas though. I'm in Western PA.

POST 32Original post

Since the A/C system operates 24/7 then opening the A/C clutch circuit except when actual cooling, initial cabin cooldown, is needed will improve FE. My switch for that is conveniently mounted on the back wall of the console "cubby". It spends a LOT of time in the "off" position.

POST 33Original post

Quotes source post: 9915324

Monitoring engine load with the A/C on or off (barring having the A/C deal with a very hot cabin on a hot day) and at least with the autoclimate system which is what my cars have with its variable displacement A/C compressor the system barely causes an uptick on the percent of load when switched on and a down tick when switched off. These modern A/C systems are pretty darn efficient and do not present that much of a parasitic load. Oh, what appears to be a goodly amount of parasitic load is the electrical power required to run the cabin vent fan and the head/tail lights. Sincerely, Macster.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.