20 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHTires for Driving School
Leading reported evidence
Check on the school
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Check on the school' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check on the school' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
In any case, inspect the overall condition of the rubber before you venture out there.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
A while back I had to replace one of the rear tires (and repair a banged up wheel) when a street curb jumped out and hit them (expensive lesson).
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
It's not unsafe to run a tire that has yet to hit the wear markers.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The tech inspector is using the logic you are trying to sell just to get him into a new set of tires and turn a profit.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
20 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T072535Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Signed up for one day driving school at Pacific Raceways next week. Went in to the dealer for pre-school inspection on my 02 C4 cab and was told I can't attend unless I purchase new rear tires. One of my Pirelli P Zero Rossos is at 2.5mm and the other is at 4.5mm. Dealer will gladly sell me a pair but I have two issues - not many seem to like the P Zeros but my fronts are nowhere near needing to be replaced. Second and potentially more problematic - I've read that these tires are not to be run at high speed for about 500 miles. Dealer can't get them and install until a day or two before the school. Should I take a rain check on the school?
That's odd since you get better grip with shaved tires! **More tread depth/patterns on dry surface = less grip (hint....check out the tread pattern and depth on tires like the MPSC)**
Are they past the wear bars?
They need to be more clear on what they mean. It's not unsafe to run a tire that has yet to hit the wear markers. I would be concerned about the asymmetric wear on your rear tires. Why does one tire have 4.5 mm of tread while the other has 2.5 mm.
A while back I had to replace one of the rear tires (and repair a banged up wheel) when a street curb jumped out and hit them (expensive lesson). When they installed the new tire they said it was ok to have uneven wear between the two tires because the new tire would be within 2mm of the old, undamaged one (8.5mm and 6.5mm).
I'd have to agree that it should be OK to drive a track so long as you are not at or beyond the wear bars. 2 mm diff in tread depth I don't have an opinion. Might be a moot point, though, 'cuz the service guy won't clear your car for the tech inspection. You can always go to another service tech to see if there is a difference in opinion.
Gsessler - Man, don't you just HATE IT when those curbs won't stay put?
BTW, this morning at 6:00 A.M., when I first saw your avatar, I was laughing so hard and so loud that I thought I was going to wake up my wife who was still asleep on the other side of the house! I am a Lutheran, but my wife is Catholic, so I totally understand about the rosary beads. That is just the funniest pic I have seen in years!
Look, if the tires will not pass inspection for Driver's Ed, then they need to be replaced. But check you local rules for DE...like who is in charge of tech inspections in your region--ask them. But clearly if you value your safety and the car, why not replace the tire(s) that need to be replaced? Seems pretty logical to me. It's like the old saying, "y'got a $50 head? Buy a $50 helmet! Don't over think tires mate--it's where the rubber meets the road.
agio.....have to disagree with you (as most will). His tires are NOT unsafe for the DE when they haven't hit the wear bars yet. The tech inspector is using the logic you are trying to sell just to get him into a new set of tires and turn a profit. Besides, his current tires will OUTPERFORM the new one especially since they haven't been broken in yet and will be very greasy. Now which tires are more safe?
Ah, your point is well taken mate. I was simply stating my opinion regarding "safety." I didn't go into his level of driving experience on the track, which matters a whole lot. If he is very new to this, then perhaps your point about his tires are moot. My only thought related to safety, first and last. I always encourage (and sometimes insist that) my students show up at the track with a base level of safety and if they or their cars are below minimum standards, then they don't run.
But if, as you say, his tires are "good enough," then so be it. If he's getting ripped off because someone wants to make a sale, then I certainly agree with you. But frankly, I don't buy it. Tires, almost above all else, need to be in good enough shape so that the tech inspector can have a "clear conscience" regarding safety. The "profit" on a new tire is relatively small provided the prices are competitive, so I find it difficult to imagine that "profit" on a new tire that is competitively priced is the motive.
Sorry for the long winded reply.
Thanks for all the input- taking a pass on this DE as the image of greasy new tires doesn't sit well with me. I'll sign up for the next one and get new rubber well in advance.
Get the new tires if you feel you must and go get them de-greased in advance! Go drive the crap out of them (you need about 500 miles to break them in).
Here is an article about it
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete...currentpage=26
I'd look for a different driving school, but go on your old tires. If you aren't a track junkie, there is no reason to wear your new tires, as opposed to wearing out the last bit of tires that are just about gone. You will probably come home with the 2.5 mm tire down to the last of the tread and have no remorse over throwing them away. AS
Let me chime in on this > As a certified NASA instructor (and racer in BMWCCA, SCCA & NASA), the tread depth is immaterial. In fact, less is better for reasons stated above. What is MOST important is the age of the tire. As it ages, the rubber hardens and loses its compliance. It just happens a lot slower on the street, but on track it's known as heat cycles. That will degrade any tire's performance many times over tread depth. Moreover, one should look at sidewall condition for telltale signs of hairline cracks as the carcass ages. That's a big deal if the car does more sitting than driving.
Only caveat to tread depth is a wet track. Even there, soft and compliant rubber is always preferable. In any case, inspect the overall condition of the rubber before you venture out there.
I don't know what was the reason for him telling that your tires are not good but I have treaded several tires (below the tread markers) at the track and that's what I do with all the R compound tires. I think that your tires will be fine. Just check them after every session. Just a suggestion though if you plan to track the car consider a set of semi-slicks. Michelins Sport cup are good and I would stay away from the Pirelli Corsa due to my previous bad experiences.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.