4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHcdc 3 removal
Leading reported evidence
Check wires carefully and see no wiring malfunction
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I checked the wires carefully and see no wiring malfunction.
Leading evidence: 'Check wires carefully and see no wiring malfunction' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check diy' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
My current CDC-3 as well as the replacement I bought from eBay from a seemingly reliable source who had used the CDC have BOTH failed to eject cartridges and both have same CDR-210 message that they have No Magazine.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Driving me nuts - do I just keep buying used CDC-3s until one works?
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
My current CDC-3 as well as the replacement I bought from eBay from a seemingly reliable source who had used the CDC have BOTH failed to eject cartridges and both have same CDR-210 message that they have No Magazine.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T155324Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
hi all -my cdc 3 [layer jammed...need to remove it - any instructions how to remove it from the bracket in the trunk? also can ireplace it with the ipod cable from becker - where are those instructions?
thanks, larry
larry,
If the casette is stuck you should be able to remove it with a thin metal bar. Like a metal machineist scale or a steak knife. Open the cover and look down inside towards the front of the unit. There is a pin that holds the cassette in place You can slide the blade in between the front of the cassette and the player and push the pin towards the passenger side of the car. You will probably have to lightly press down on the cassette to release the spring pressure.
check my DIY on renntech
http://www.renntech.org/forums/index...orsche-996-c2/
I have picture showing the CDC-3 out of the trunk tabs
If I recall, you simply unscrew the bottom screw after that you can pull it up. But it is really a pain, so you have to play back and forth with some force. look at the picture and you will see how the hook system works.
The hook is like an arrow, so once the system is in, it is a bit hard to get it out, but it will slide out with patience.
check the pics, I am sure this will hepl
My current CDC-3 as well as the replacement I bought from eBay from a seemingly reliable source who had used the CDC have BOTH failed to eject cartridges and both have same CDR-210 message that they have No Magazine. Is there a radio fault that will cause this? I checked the wires carefully and see no wiring malfunction. Driving me nuts - do I just keep buying used CDC-3s until one works? How ro diagnose what is going on? (p.s. - the replacement CDC-3 DOES make the correct noise of going through the cartridge slots one by one for about four slots when I hook up the cable, something I do not recall the current CDC doing since it stopped working.
Oh - if you suggest Rennlist tech DIY site, I do not have access to that.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
