32 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWill this wing work for my 996?
Reported or suspected cause
even bigger threat) can do the same
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
Of course, every wacko who sees you in real life (probably an even bigger threat) can do the same.
Leading evidence: 'even bigger threat) can do the same' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'even bigger threat) can do the same' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Disconnect harness' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
The instructions say "1990-2002-Disconnect the harness for the automatic wing at the bottom of deck lid unbolt the automatic wing and remove.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Now if its added aftermarket, and especially if it isnt OEM, that changes things dramatically.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
also remove any blowers if you have a 99-2002 car and replace with spoiler."
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
But like you also said, pretty much wackos everywhere & you probably run into them everyday, so if anybody really wanted you that bad they could probably find you but I just didn't think there was any reason anybody just had to see it, since its not personalized anyway.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
But like you also said, pretty much wackos everywhere & you probably run into them everyday, so if anybody really wanted you that bad they could probably find you but I just didn't think there was any reason anybody just had to see it, since its not personalized anyway.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
32 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
I have the opportunity to purchase this wing for CHEAP but not sure about the fan/intake area.
The instructions say "1990-2002-Disconnect the harness for the automatic wing at the bottom of deck lid unbolt the automatic wing and remove. also remove any blowers if you have a 99-2002 car and replace with spoiler."
Do I need to retrofit my fan back on it? Will the intake be ok?
I think we need more information to help. For example, who is the manufacturer? Someone might have experience with this wing. Is it cut for a NB or WB car? What kind of car do you have (NB or WB)? Is your 996 a coupe or cab? Blah, blah, blah...
-Eric
Gotcha!
I don't have manufacturer info, just those pics and confirmation that it will fit my '99 c2 NB coupe.
I'm guessing you disassemble the stock wing like the pic below and bolt it up somehow
You might have to drill some holes in the wing if it doesn't have them at the right places.
I found this on youtube when I was pining for a GT2 wing.. Might be helpful.
You Tube
Thanks for the help guys!
I'm still not sure about the fan placement. I guess I'll get the wing and find out. Apparently it's a no-no to go without the fan if you live in a hot place so I'll have to figure it out.
Shyamvenky: did you get the wing?
Looks like you got one of the cheaper replicas. I currently have an OEM piece but before that, I had a replica but it had the solid base on the underside to mount the fans and mouldings and such. I didn't need to transfer over the factory bottom plate. Looks like you might have to go that route though...
Your wing looks a bit "interesting" to say the least". It has the bolts sticking out the front of the wing for what would be a pivot but then your brackets toward the rear of the wing blade seems a bit ghetto and non-adjustable. I could be wrong but that's how it looks from the pics.
It certainly looks that way alpine, thanks for the comments.
BUT I have the opportunity to get it for so cheap I don't think it would hurt to see what it's like
I can't get myself to spend 1k on a wing.
A little off compared to the real deal that's for sure:
I backed out because $1200 was too much just for a wing. But I've always had a thing for the GT2 wing. Its on my bucket list for cosmetic mods next year
Wow, where are ya'll getting your prices from? I got mine from Better Bodies Motorsport in SD & it was no where near that price & even cheaper if you're a PCA Member! And they have pretty much Any kind you want! jmo
I don't know Why anybody would spend that much just because its an OEM, especially on a 996 unless you planned on keeping the car & then I Still don't know Why you would do it, unless you just Have to Have Brand Name items. jmo
It's called trying a rep and finding out he much it sucked and spending the extra change to do what I should of done in the first place. Yes I have nothing against reps if the quality is there. Yes I think it's rediculous how much mark up the "Porsche tax" adds to similar parts that are marketed specifically to Porsche. Yes, I do have to save some money sometimes and buy used. Yes having 100% OEM aero kit will help resale value and minimize depreciation if I decide to sell later on.
No I don't buy Kirkland underwear and jeans.
I promise you, if you ever trade that car in for another one at the Dealership, you're Not getting anymore for that car that what that lil' blue book tells them its worth. You could have 4k dollar wheels on it & its still not gonna help you (thats why if somebody trades in their car, they take everything they can off of it & put everything back on it stock) & then try & sale the rest of the high dollar stuff they put on it & HOPE you can get back half of what you paid for it! jmo
I traded in my aerokit 911 (99) back in 07 on a truck and they absolutely added value on the offer price based on the options. I definitely got a few grand more because of the aerokit and mix of other desirable options on it vs a stripped out one. You're wrong if you think that doesnt happen. If you notice the little blue book includes modifiers for options just like it does for mileage and condition. Everything is negotiable. Lots of people aren't great negotiators and assume that getting screwed is "normal", but it really isn't. On private sale, if you have an aerokit car you just need to hold out for someone who *actually wants the aerokit* (rather than panic sell to low ballers) and you'll get your price. The aerokit option is pretty significant
Now if its added aftermarket, and especially if it isnt OEM, that changes things dramatically. In these cases I 100% agree that not only would you not get additional cash on the trade, you might actually lose money. Private sale would be tougher too as you'd have to hold out for a buyer who doesnt mind "mods".
Well I've never traded a car in at the dealer so I don't have to worry about that. Mk1 OEM aero kits are somewhat rare, especially on post '99 cars so I would think they would boost the resale somewhat. Now for the resale of a car that has illegally tinted taillights and knockoff wing, I'm not so sure of...
They can give you a ticket.
-Eric
P.S. FWIW, I think some are probably concerned that some Internet wacko will use it to figure out who they really are, where they live, etc. In some ways I get it. A lot of people online would rather remain anonymous or, at least, relatively anonymous. A license plate actually offers a lot of information with someone who has the right resources. Of course, every wacko who sees you in real life (probably an even bigger threat) can do the same. Maybe I should drive around with a rag covering my license plate.
Mlambert you're right, maybe I just worded it wrong. But, yeah ANY mods to a car may or may not help you when you get ready to sell it. Alot of times a person wants a stock one so he/she can put their own personal mods on it & sometimes you may get lucky & they love that particular look of it. Shark as for the license plate, the rag's no different than when anybody else posts a pic of theirs but they just erase it or cover it up, you gonna tell me you've NEVER seen this? Would you want Everybody knowing your address & phone # (do you not believe somebody can't get your lic. plate # & find out just about ANY thing they want about that car & its owner). jmo
Sue, I just saw the bottom of your post. I've just Always seen & been told that its NOT a good idea to show it (when there's really NO reason to) if you look on many forums MOST of them ARE covered up. But like you also said, pretty much wackos everywhere & you probably run into them everyday, so if anybody really wanted you that bad they could probably find you but I just didn't think there was any reason anybody just had to see it, since its not personalized anyway. jmo
Porrsha, that looks alot like mine (where did you get it from). I really like the wheels on it also, I've just never been a yellow car guy (I've seen some nice looking ones but I don't think I could ever pull the trigger & buy one) but you know the old saying never say never! Lol! Gator, I think you've got your car looking Great why do you want to put a different wing on it (I really like your tail lights also) to me a Porsche looks soooo much better with a wing (I don't care what model or year) but the Taco is probably my least favorite of all! jmo
Definitely interested Trapper. Let me do a little research on the ERS and I will get with ya soon. Is the underside already prepped for the fans, latches, etc?
