17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH2002 996 SOLD at BJ LV for $49,000
Leading reported evidence
Check their website tomorrow
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Check their website tomorrow' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check their website tomorrow' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T120458Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Just saw it cross the block and sell at $49,000 plus buyers premium.
Silver with lots of Gemballa mods.
Barret-Jackson Auction Las Vegas. Just now.
Tuned in too late to catch all the details on the car. Check their website tomorrow.
This DOES NOT mean our MKI coupes and cabs just doubled in resale value. The original owner probably spent $150,000+ back in the day.
Yea i saw it also. I didn't catch all the details but saw the end of the auction. It was nice but seemed about 19k over what I thought it would go for?
I don't get it? Body kit, ugly interior and Lambo doors and you get TT price for a 996 cab that does not have any of the TT go? Damn, I am so doing it wrong with my car.
We need a "politically correct game plan" in case the new owner shows up here in a couple weeks, all proud of his new purchase and wanting to be part of the gang, and asserting that the Lambo doors are actually a rare factory option.
We could be covertly nasty and redirect him to the Turbo Forum.
Wow what an idiot! They could have bought a similar mileage Turbo Cab for nearly the same price.... If that car had FI upgrades then "maybe" they could justify a price in the mid $40's, but even that is pushing it.
I cna't believe someone would make a turbo appearance kti on a base 911... may be some saudi who wanted his son to stay within decent speed limits
that is the only thing I can think of
