22 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPotential New Car Purchase
Reported or suspected cause
good thing
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause · Original poster
But it would have a new car warantee, which in view of the RMS issues is probably a good thing.
Leading evidence: 'good thing' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'good thing' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Test drives and the delivery miles' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Pretty much a few test drives and the delivery miles.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If "new" mileage is high would think it could be many test miles.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Even if you use a lower depreciation rate of 10% (from a car that holds its value better than most like a BMW), the car is worth about $70,500 (87,000 X 90% = 78,300 X 90% = 70,4700).
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Even if you use a lower depreciation rate of 10% (from a car that holds its value better than most like a BMW), the car is worth about $70,500 (87,000 X 90% = 78,300 X 90% = 70,4700).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
22 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T165820Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
A local dealer has a new, never sold 2004 996 Cab for sale at a heavily discounted price. It is a pretty basic car without alot of options - just upgraded wheels, power heated seats, HI-Fi sound, zenon lights, etc. Any thoughts on the wisdom of buying (or trading for) a 'new' car that old? I realize there would be the depreciation issue, but I would appreciate any insights on things I shouls consider.
Is it a C2 or a C4? If a C2, does it have PSM? You can't add it after and although it is a personal preference, I would not buy a car without it. Lastly, although a small thing, you are in Il - Does it have heated seats. To me this is a "must have" for a cab.
If it has all that stuff and you can get it at a good price, go for it. It will have the full 4YR/50K mile warranty. I would price against a low mileage '04 and add a little extra for being new. Just make sure that it wasn't used at something like the Porsche Driving Experience and that is why it is "new." How many miles are on it?
When it comes to pricing, remember that an '04 car with no miles is still a used car. It is NOT a new car and should not be priced like one. The car has already depreciated since it's a past model year, and you shouldn't have to pay for that depreciation, the dealer should.
The car has a sticker of $87,080. Asking price is $73,900. Miles are around 50 - possibly a few more as I drove it for about 10 miles or so a few days ago, so it doesn't appear to be a demo car or one that was used as a corporate vehicle. It's Arctic Silver/Black and fairly plain as far as options, so I guess it's just one that never sold from the '04 model year - not eye catching enough maybe.
So it appears that the dealer has priced in a good amount of depreciation. I realize that as soon as it leaves the dealer lot it is a used car, with all that entails. But it would have a new car warantee, which in view of the RMS issues is probably a good thing. I wonder if there could be any long term problems with a car that sat so long?
$74k seems high to me too. Consider this... I recently saw a 40th Anniversary (which of course is an '04) with @ 5,000 miles listed at $69,950 (most likely sold for less). As was stated earlier.... At this point, model year is primary, mileage is secondary.
If I were you, I would bid $66.5k for the car, and pay no more than $68k.
Keep in mind, there is a reason why the dealer still has this car on his lot... He's got it priced way too high.
You've got absolutelty nothing to lose by lobbing in a low-ball bid.
Good Luck,
Matt
Don't forget a lot of the 40ths (with a 90-93K sticker) were subsidized by PCNA and sold for 18-20K off of MSRP.
On this 04 Cab, I'm thinking about the same as MJM - 20k off MSRP makes it about 67K - say 68K max and I think its a decent deal. But it might be worth considering a used 997 too, unless you've gotta have a cab, in which case you will have to wait a while.
Average depreciation on a car is in the 14% - 18% per year, depending upon the car. In a month or so, right after the official launch of the '06 models, this car will be two years old. Even if you use a lower depreciation rate of 10% (from a car that holds its value better than most like a BMW), the car is worth about $70,500 (87,000 X 90% = 78,300 X 90% = 70,4700). I was looking at a new, untitled '04 C2 (AS/Black) Coupe in February of this year. It was not heavily appointed and sticker was $76,500. Dealer offered it for 64,500 or 15.7% off sticker. I didn't like the interior color and the minimal options, so I passed on it and kept looking. I found my Lapis Blue car a month later - more potions, 6,400 miles, and $2,000 less. Orig sticker was $81,175.
My thought is to get a cab. I presently have an '02 911 Turbo/Tiptronic, which is an amazing car. However, it is a coupe and comes off waranty in a few more months , which makes me a little nervous. I would trade the Turbo to the dealer for the '04 Cab, and probably get some $$ back (or extended warranty, winter wheels etc. My goal is actually threfold - 1) Have a newer car 2 ) Have a car which is a better everyday driver than the turbo 3) Have a cabriolet. In a perfect world I'd buy a Turbo Cab, but I don't want to spend the add'l $ to do so. What to do...
You're in a good position with the trade in. I am looking a getting a 996 cab, having some fun for a few months or a year and then I plan on putting a supercharger in it. I should be able to do this for about $30,000-$40,000 less than getting a 999 turbo cab.
Trading with a Porsche is a "no win" scenario.....I think that 70k to 72 k is a reasonable deal......on straight purschase
I just sold a loaded '02 Cab. for almost $60,000
Good question. The goal would be to keep it long term and drive it year round. It has a hard top that goes with it; that and a set of winter wheels and snowtires ought to make it a good year round car. I have an older car for track use, so this one will be street driven only for the most part.
I don't think a cab will be a better dd than a tt, less flashy maybe. I dunno, never really liked cabs, my 6yo daughter says they're girls cars anyway, now I could never get one!