fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Replacement IMS 'failed'?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHReplacement IMS 'failed'?

Leading reported evidence

Run long time

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

That bearing and flange looks as though it was driven or run for a long time on a failing bearing, yet the op says "there was no unusual noise" just a CEL...

Replacement IMS 'failed'?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run long time' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run long time' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 16 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run long time

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

That bearing and flange looks as though it was driven or run for a long time on a failing bearing, yet the op says "there was no unusual noise" just a CEL...

Replacement IMS 'failed'?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T075545Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Anyone following this from another forum? https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...-tale-woe.html With another thread already discussing non-original bearing failures, I thought this would get included in the thread. His flange gets quite a hammering from the state of it, must had been wobbling a wee bit!

POST 2Original post

Haven't seen that before but will follow along to see how it concludes i guess the real question is, is this fail due to an aftermarket bearing or would a stock bearing fail too?

POST 3Original post

As much as I feel for the poster if that story is real, something just doesn't add up. That bearing and flange looks as though it was driven or run for a long time on a failing bearing, yet the op says "there was no unusual noise" just a CEL... I'm calling bs, at the very least on the story and/or timeline...

POST 4Original post

I have to agree, something's not adding up on that one.

POST 5Original post

Quotes source post: 14326018

Nah, that looks just like the examples of failed bearings I've seen in person (my Indy has a couple in his "throphy" case) and in pictures. I agree that the description doesn't sound right though. I don't think of ever heard of a quiet failure. Maybe he had music blasting and couldn't hear it? Of course, as always, the question is what really failed first? Was it the bearing that took out the motor, or something else that took it out.

POST 8Original post

If my plug looked like that should I be worried...?

POST 10Original post

[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:] https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=480048&stc=1&thumb=1&d=1499997782

POST 12Original post

Quotes source post: 14328950

Nah, that plug is still in great shape. Just needs a little cleaning.

POST 14Original post

Impressive generosity from Charles in that thread.

POST 15Original post

Quotes source post: 14325632

If you're looking for the procedure, check out the link below. Please let us know if you have any questions! http://www.pelicanparts.com/techarti...MS_Bearing.htm

POST 16Original post

Quotes source post: 14328556

I sure hope he had a third party warranty on that motor!!!

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.