36 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH$1,000,000 996 C4S Cab
Leading reported evidence
Use laugh
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use laugh' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use laugh' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
36 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T220748Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I figured the 996 would start to appreciate some day. Just not so soon...
Found this on PCA website.
$5 million once patent is approved. It has 76k miles.
"THIS IS A ONE OF A KIND PORSCHE THAT NO ONE IN THE WORLD HAS. THE CEO PORSCHE AG CONFIRMS THIS. (VIEW LETTER) THIS PORSCHE IS CURRENTLY PENDING PATENT WHICH MEANS THAT NO ONE CAN COPY HOW I HAVE MY PORSCHE PAINTED (SEE LETTER) MY PORSCHE WILL SPEAK FOR ITSELF. PORSCHE WITH PATENT 5 MILLION $$"
[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:]
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/500x377/a5242dd4_dccf_461c_b563_1ad4afabd738_ed014d673a0a89e6fe3fa920d8467cd329a4ac4c.jpeg
I can't believe PCA would even allow an ad like that. Seriously? They should be embarrassed. I'll be throwing my renewal in the garbage.
Either this seller is a troll or a meth addict.
seems like a solid investment. cruise around looking for all of those other cars with tacky red accents out there and sue them to defend the "patent"...I dig it.
Judging by the asking price, the photos, and the post... I'm not necessarily good at guessing this but I'd guess this person has smoked meth at least 5 times.
Patent, red paint on black, stupid price. If some idiot pays anything more than he should for a tatty C4S in need or parts and paint more fool them....
Has he ever read about what a patent is ?
Great advertising idea for PCA which must be losing memberships - Everyone wants to tell the owner of the car what a piece of sh_t it is and can't without PCA subscription - Smart way to build membership #'s
[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:]
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/220x178/tenor_d39d73aab9baf3fd44067b2ec3ab910b8567cb3b.gif
I love the documentation. The letter from Porsche says that they received the photo he sent. The letter from the patent office says that they received his application. Seems like a done deal to me.