13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCabrio quick question..
Leading reported evidence
Run top up
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Didn't have time to run the top up to check if that is correct operation....???
Leading evidence: 'Run top up' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run top up' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T063944Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I was in a hurry and put the cab (996 2003) away with the top down and was going to cover it...I wanted to put the windows up, only the fronts went up ...is this normal..
Didn't have time to run the top up to check if that is correct operation....???
You can override it by sticking your pinky in the slot where the top latches in the front, while you press the window button. There is a micro switch in there.
This is an interesting 996 hack to get the rear quarter windows up when the top is down, and yes it works with whichever finger you use. I think it looks good too!
Rear quarter windows up with top-down
My question is why Porsche doesn't want the rear windows up when top-down? /X3
Simple. The quarter glass is (in a way) supported by the top. If someone were to have the quarter glass up and accidently lean on it too hard you can easily shatter the glass or bend the regulator.
And you do NOT want to mess up that regulator.
While the door regulators are quite easy to swap out the quarter windows are a huge pain. I had to swap mine out in the middle of winter when I put on my hardtop for the season and the window wouldn't come back up. Not a fun repair at all.
