30 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHH&R vs Feal coilovers
Leading reported evidence
Install since september 2018
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I’ve had my Feal coilovers installed since September 2018.
Leading evidence: 'Install since september 2018' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check diy's' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
For my C2 I ran ksport and was very happy with them.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Check the DIY's on Pelican Parts - they will typically list any special tools you need for the common jobs.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I suggest replacing top mounts and inspecting/replacing control arms as needed while your in there.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I spoke with a gentleman about replacing all the bushes and rubbers on the entire car.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I have h&r street performance coilovers , h&r swaybars and all the bushes have been replaced with powerflex purple street polybushes , it's a great set up , you will probably need adjustable frount drop links and rear toe links if lowering the car with either CO
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The base 441 is a street oriented coilover and will not rattle your teeth out like some of the other aftermarket coilovers I've seen - I've found I like running damping set on the firmer side of the spectrum, but they are still road trip and DD friendly, not harsh at all.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
30 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T000231Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I need to go coilovers to get a bit lower stance. I am looking at tne H&R street performance and the Feal 441 kits. Anyone have opinions on these? The feal is a bit cheaper and includes the top mounts, where the h&r will require separate mounts
You pretty much get what you pay for in suspension components. I have the H&R Street Performance coilovers on my car and I'm happy with them. I have not heard anything bad about H&R. Your post is the first I've seen mention Feal. I don't think the suspension is where you want to go "super cheap."
Feal looks like a good company and the RL'ers who have tried them have been very pleased. What I like about Feal is that they will custom build your coilovers and select the proper valving and spring rate to meet your application.
I'm new to the suspension setup as well, I'm looking for the most aggressive handling suspension system that I can buy within budget. I do not Care about comfort one bit what so ever. I'm just looking for the best suspension for smoother road surface.
I'm looking for a fun canyon setup to compliment some H&R sways. So far leaning towards putting an OEM M030 setup on the car. Partially to preserve some clearance while improving handling (SLC isn't the most friendly town for stance nation). A distant afterthought is resale, where I assume the market will value M030 a bit higher than a random street coilover setup.
Ive had the H&R setup for years now, not bad. I suggest replacing top mounts and inspecting/replacing control arms as needed while your in there. The cost will add up but doing it right first time around is well worth it. Now that ohlins supplies coilovers I would consider them, more $ but nobody questions their quality.
I spoke with a gentleman about replacing all the bushes and rubbers on the entire car. He mentioned no specific tools required, can this be done oon at home with common metrics tools, rubber mallet? I'm going to first address all my bushings first with poly. Then The coil over
Check the DIY's on Pelican Parts - they will typically list any special tools you need for the common jobs. Some tools I didn't own before but I now consider "standard" are high-quality micro Torx, a boatload of security Torx, triple-square drivers, both star and allen drivers for the caliper bolts (because I never know what's going to show up), and the monster socket for the hub nut (32mm, I think)...
Thanks, yes he sounded like he was on the dumb side. So what's needed to press those bushings. 5chnl those are some great suggestions on those tools needed.
The rubber bushings are fine for street use and occasional track duty. A lot of the bushing will require a press to replace. You really have to go solid bushings everywhere to get a real performance difference. But that's obviously not recommended for the street. The poly's are in between rubber and solid and I think there are a lot of places you can get more performance for your dollar.
For my C2 I ran ksport and was very happy with them. They came with solid top mounts and drop links for the rear sway bar. . . and they were able to take the car very low.
Both seem like they have positive reviews. I have the Feal 441's myself and have been happy with them. I got the first set of 996 fitment 441's sold through their website, which I was confident in after being familiar with them in the Subaru world for several years. I think they are hard to beat for their value - they come with front camber plates, swift springs, have independent height/preload adjustments, adjustable damping, and are rebuildable by Feal in the US for $75 a corner for the original owner. The base 441 is a street oriented coilover and will not rattle your teeth out like some of the other aftermarket coilovers I've seen - I've found I like running damping set on the firmer side of the spectrum, but they are still road trip and DD friendly, not harsh at all. For semi-regular track use I'd say that the stiffer road race version would be the better choice. If anyone in the DC metro area wants a ride-along I'm happy to offer it.
That said, there are a few little issues I think they are still sorting out to keep in mind. The rear studs were threaded differently than my oem struts so I had to run get some new nuts, adjustable swaybar droplinks may be a good idea for any ride height significantly different than stock, and another user on the forum found them to be a very tight fit in the front carriers on his Turbo. Their customer service has been great in my experience though, as I've had all my emails responded to in less than a day by knowledgeable staff.
The H&R seem to be good quality but they don't offer much in the way of adjustment. For some that may be a positive as they're less effort to set up, but I wanted a bit more flexibility, and they seemed kinda pricey to not include mounts.
I have h&r street performance coilovers , h&r swaybars and all the bushes have been replaced with powerflex purple street polybushes , it's a great set up , you will probably need adjustable frount drop links and rear toe links if lowering the car with either CO
The h&r sp coilovers have dampers by bilstein and all the components are made in Germany . It's good kit and fully rebuildable
intersting thread, I am considering PSS10 and H&R RSS. I have H&R sports springs in my car now and I found too much camber at the back. I have a 996 C4S.
I guess if i lowered my car (no matter which suspension setup I choose, I will need the rear camber link kit to correct my camber?
If that's rear, US spec calls for -1.15 degrees camber all the way up to the X74 spec of -1.65. I've been able to lower mine a few inches and still hit the -1.6 without issue.
I’ve had my Feal coilovers installed since September 2018.
I’m still very happy with them.
Mine are adjusted at their maximum height since it is my DD and I have to deal with speed bumps and steep driveways.
My 441's have held up well but as I've gotten more experience on track the street-oriented coilovers have begun showing their limits - definitely need more stiffness in the rear for track use. I've done 16 track days with them since I've had them, and will probably send them back to Feal after this season to rebuild them into a more track-friendly spec. Certainly been very pleased with them for daily driving and autocross duties though, they are a great deal.
I've had my FEAL 441s for over 2 years on my 996tt and they are still fantastic even with our really awful roads. All street duty so far, but I will soon be PCA Club Racing with these shocks/springs once I get the cage done. As mentioned before in this thread, their service and all of my dealings with them to get the valving right, as well as the drop link arrangement (I think I was the first 996tt with their product), have been excellent.
I put ksports on my my '02 C2 a couple weeks ago. They are damping adjustable. 35 ways I think. I have mine set to the middle all around. They also have camber plates and eliminate the need for getting new or reusing the upper strut mounts.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.