22 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWould you buy this 2004 911 40th AE?
Reported or suspected cause
nicest optioned 996 carrera
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'nicest optioned 996 carrera' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'nicest optioned 996 carrera' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean carfax' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
this is clearly a garage queen, as was mine and most likely a 2nd second car
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
My advice on the car you are looking at or any other is to budget for a comprehensive PPI and for not just major "weak point" things like IMS and the related "while you're in there" things, but also wear items that might need to be replaced just because it's time.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
My advice on the car you are looking at or any other is to budget for a comprehensive PPI and for not just major "weak point" things like IMS and the related "while you're in there" things, but also wear items that might need to be replaced just because it's time.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
22 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T144035Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm new to the 911 world. I currently own a 2008 Cayman and thinking of moving into a 911. So far, the only info I have on the car is:
No known accidents
No maint. records. Current owner states it only needed oil changes.
Currently on it's 5th owner.
30K miles
price $38K
Think this is worth pursuing?
Thanks.
The 40th AE is a great car but it is 14 years old and it is a 996 (with potential problems lurking) so I'd want as much historical info about the car as possible plus a very very thorough PPI if you get to that point. Price is on the high side.
What is your motivation? What do you want?
$38K for a 996 (even a 40th AE) without services records seems way too high. For that money you are in range of a 996 turbo.
Having said that, if the car speaks to you, why not?
ppppffffff, no records? 14yo car @ premium price? Buy a 997 for that budget imo. Or get more info on it. AEs are sweet, but the mix of no records, 5 owners & minimal miles is not a mix to support a high price. Maybe after a thorough PPI & driving it to make sure there's nothing obvious.
A 997S is a similar experience to the 40th AE but feels a little more modern (lighter controls). So if you want the more mechanical, connected feel, the 40th is the way to go. My dad has an 05 997S, which is the "early" one that only has 355hp, and I prefer driving the 40th to it.
A low mileage 40th would be a great car, but since it's a garage queen you'd absolutely need to budget an IMS bearing or IMS Solution install.
I've had my 40th for 8 years and about 50k miles now and have loved it. I drove a 997TT and even though the power of the turbo is great, the AWD makes the car less fun to drive in my opinion. Not worth the huge price difference!
I think it's worth going after if you can knock off some money. That's pretty low mileage and there are not many out there for sale. How are the tires brakes, etc? If he doesn't have the IMS done you can deduct a little for that. Luggage, window sticker or other fun stuff? What options? Clean carfax?
Regarding this being 997 money, I agree it is, but to me the 40th is a better choice.
I'm on my 2nd one and when I sold my 996 turbo in March I drove the 997.1s and 997.2 thinking I would do one or the other and neither car felt special to me. Plus you can't service the IMS (there have been some failures of the upgraded ones but not many). there seems to be more issues with cylinder scoring on the 997 as well.
The 997.2 non s did nothing for me, I was disappointed really, as I liked the seemingly bullet proof 9A1.
So I'm back in a 40th with no regrets and at 47 years old and having had 55 or 56 cars, that says a lot. I usually have a pretty bad gotta move on itch by now and I don't.
Keep searching more will come up. Need to test drive one? Pm me as I think you are in Chicago too.
Similar 997.1S test drive for me. Other than the power increase, I thought the car was less engaging, quieter, and overall less fun to drive than my Cayman. Maybe it's worth checking out after all. Also, thanks for the test drive invitation, but I'm located in New England.
clubracer6 makes some valid points, he sold my 26k car three years ago
of the 5 owners, how many were dealers ?
this is clearly a garage queen, as was mine and most likely a 2nd second car
for most of the previous owners
take a second look at the car, consider that 911user in Minnesota has over 330,000
on his 40th
there's a little bit more value here, full leather, X51, the GT paint..it's a unique C2
I had the retrofit done at 27k and have been upgrading ever since, these are wonderful cars
If this is true, it's worth a premium of some sort. I originally scoffed at the 40th but in doing more research, it may tops among the 996 NA cars. Can anyone verify or give any informed opinions on these 40th Anniversary upgrades?
"Significantly, it is not just power output upgrades, having both additional cooling (centre radiator) and lubrication upgrades (high-G sump baffles, additional pump and oil lines). Those two options are almost worth the entry ticket alone: as the 996 cylinder failures almost always involve the overheating and under lubrication of cylinder number 6, these modifications go someway to mitigating the seizures."
My 911 history is:
71 911 T
06 997 C4s
07 997 TT
04 996 40th AE
08 997 TT
10 997 GTS
04 996 40th AE
I really like the 40th AE – as you can see, I keep coming back to it. Folks are amazed when they ask me about it and I tell them it’s almost 14 years old. It's a great car!
That's high praise, indeed. Everyone I've read that has owned one (a few have owned one more than once, like you) all have great things to say. LSD, X51, interior and exterior styling, and only 739 available to US buyers.
PCA did a 996 Model Guide in December 2016, and the author had this to say:
"Excluding the GT3’s, which are great for the track but difficult to live with the rest of the week, my favorite 996 is the 40th Anniversary edition, sold only in model year 2004 in a limited production run of 1963 units (to commemorate the first year of the 911 in Germany). What’s so great about the car is that it had just about everything an enthusiast would want in the car already installed from the factory – inside and out. The car features a more aggressive turbo nose in the front and polished tips in the back. All the best options (wheels, X51 power) are included in the package, which made it something special."
It's growing on me...
The limited slip is a big ticket item. When I bought my first 40th, I was originally looking for MK1 aero cars with the factory LSD, when I remembered the AE had one, that was it for me.
I have a 40AE, bought earlier this year with 45K miles on it, one owner with all the original luggage and lots of records. My advice on the car you are looking at or any other is to budget for a comprehensive PPI and for not just major "weak point" things like IMS and the related "while you're in there" things, but also wear items that might need to be replaced just because it's time.
As others have said, the 40AE is a very interesting car with a unique spec that goes far beyond merely the aesthetic. The X51 power kit was a $14K stand-alone option on the 996.2, and these cars have that standard. Every indie mechanic who has driven my car has commented on how fast they are vis-a-vis their usual experience with 996.2. One even asked me if it had an S engine!
On the subject of the asking price for the car near you, I think that for a car that hasn't had any of the weak points addressed or doesn't have much in maintenance history, $38K is more than I would personally be willing to spend. That car had better be immaculate and have rare items like sport seats with painted backs or something.
I bought mine in January for $33K, then did IMS, RMS, clutch right away, then did water pump, coil packs and engine mounts just recently. YMMV, but keep in mind that these are 14-year-old cars and many of the low miles garage queens may have deferred maintenance waiting to be addressed.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.