11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 vs 997 DE Battle - Lookout!
Leading reported evidence
Run often misunderstood sumitomo htr z iii
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I'm running the often misunderstood Sumitomo HTR Z III.
Leading evidence: 'Run often misunderstood sumitomo htr z iii' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run often misunderstood sumitomo htr z iii' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'm assuming you were using Harry's Lap Timer and Go-Pro?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Getting a point by coming into a corner is always exciting knowing you shouldn't be where you are after making the pass and using all of the track to get stable again.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Getting a point by coming into a corner is always exciting knowing you shouldn't be where you are after making the pass and using all of the track to get stable again.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T124918Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Some of us Rennlisters had a good time this past weekend thrashing our cars around the track.
Between the three of us there's likely enough video to bore you - but here's a good clip that highlights the symphony of a high revving M96 breathing through the FVD Cats and Fisters, following a supercharged 996 ME then getting blown away by an infamous ex-996 now 997 cheesehead and his FSI 4.0L work of art.
As the relative rooking in the group - I was just happy to keep up. Enjoy!
Nice video and great looking track. What is the camera/software package you used to display the realtime data etc. Very cool. Looks like you had a great time.
Great vid Steve! Still driving that track 2 days later. DWS964 is the one driving the SC car.....and for you old timers that is Ferd's old car. That clip reminds of what the FSI 4.0 is....a bull in a China shop.
Nice driving. I'm assuming you were using Harry's Lap Timer and Go-Pro? The 4.0 997 may have been quicker on the straightaway but it looked like to me you were driving a better line that he was.
What tires were you on? It looked like they were holding up to some decent g's.
Slakker wins the audio/video prize. Yep - that's Harry's with a GoPro mounted high on the windshield. Pete's a serious driver - he was probably just hanging it out there as a handicap
I'm running the often misunderstood Sumitomo HTR Z III. They hold up surprisingly well to track abuse, have a modest amount of grip and are very predictable. You can really feel them progressively give up traction - they are a good tire to learn on and are dirt cheap.
1.2 G's on the Sumitomo's sounds pretty stout to me. An engine's worth is best demonstrated on the track - not the dyno - so Pete did some might fine "demonstratin'" of the 4.0. Nice!
I can't get over what a fun weekend that was. Getting a point by coming into a corner is always exciting knowing you shouldn't be where you are after making the pass and using all of the track to get stable again.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
