61 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH$13,500?
Reported or suspected cause
"field of dreams" of threads
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: '"field of dreams" of threads' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is '"field of dreams" of threads' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Test drive" her and report back' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I think you should go "test drive" her and report back to us.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
61 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T174436Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Well it's obvious why no ones bidding on it.
The C on the Carrera badge is coming unglued. That's how it starts.
Then it all comes unraveled like a big cable knit sweater.
That car is definitely a money pit.
I was just kidding about the photoshop. The person in the photo is clearly either a dude or one mean looking chick.
I would not touch either the car or the thing next to it with a ten foot pole. Not that I have a ten foot pole!
LOL so Rennlist is a "pay to play" site now?
Funny how when I had a membership and my 951 I never pointed out how someone "needed" to be a member to be accepted and/or appreciated...but, if your intent is to be welcoming to other non-members, I think you're diplomacy is lost in translation. If not, what was your point?
Nobody should be nagged into paying to become a member if they're comfortable with the level of service offered to them as a non-paying user, i.e. there's a reason you don't need a membership to post on RL.
?
letting "users" know that what they are getting IS worth paying for is OK too... We all started as users and some stayed longer than others. I had about 50 posts before I paid for membership.
I doubt he intended on choking it out of you? Just a friendly... "hey, how about joining" comment.
Thanks ivan - I was a Rennlist Member a few years before you joined when I had my 951... again, when I was a member I never once called someone out for posting as a "user". There are people who visit this board I've tried to help and will continue to do so no matter my "status". There's simply no reason whatsoever for someone to make note of anothers "status" - in fact it may be detrimental to others visiting this site.
Regarding the OP, it seems someone likes this car to have the bid at $16k+ at this point..even with the ubiquitos tranny question looming
The Moderators decommissioned the Disregard Thread (sent it to the black hole) after someone relatively new to Rennlist posted a very explicit "spread eagle" pic. I wish they would have just deleted the post or the offending pic and not the whole thread.
Ya, but the fact that the DR thread was "on" the 996 forum made it great.
..I mean, people came from all around to see that thread. It was the "Field Of Dreams" of threads!!
