12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHmy autocross weekend
Leading reported evidence
Use training mostly
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
It's used for training mostly, so when they aren't using it on the weekends they let the SCCA use it.
Leading evidence: 'Use training mostly' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use training mostly' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T013556Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hey guys, I did an autocross over the weekend with my girlfriend.
I thought I would post the video for your viewing pleasure. This and many others are located in the Perf. & Comp Autocross forum under the "auto-x video" thread.
My first run in this video got FTPax and 3rd fastest Raw time for the day.
Runways dont make for the most creative course design, but damn that was a really fast autocross course.
It was interesting how much shuffle steering was going on. I figured the steering ratio wasn't bad. I never know what I do with my hands, so ill have to pay attention next time I codrive my dads car. I was really surprised when I drove that my thumbs were getting a bit roughed up from the stitching on the steering wheel, so perhaps I was shuffling a lot. Never worn driving gloves before, but perhaps a good thing for his car.
Good videos!
Despite the 65mph spots there were also a couple of really tight, slow parts that did require the shuffle steering. I also learned to shuffle a lot so I do it when sometimes it isn't necessary.
Nice video, thanks for posting.
Where was this autox, an abandoned airfield? I like the open design of the course which allows higher speeds than the average autox.
I've done several autoxs in my area with various cars(including a couple in a 996) and the courses are always too small and cramped to achieve speeds which make the events exciting. This is especially true if you attempt to autox in a capable high HP car like the 996. Autocrossing the 996 always gives me the thought that I have brought a gun to a knife fight. It's more than a little frustrating.
This was at an "outlying landing field" the Navy owns on the outskirts of Jacksonville. It's used for training mostly, so when they aren't using it on the weekends they let the SCCA use it. There is also an RC airplane club that is usually at the other end of the runway too.
It NC with the Tarheel sports car club we ran a lot of airstrips too, like in Laurinburg, Sanford, and Danville and even once at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point.