24 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHDecision time - Aerokit or MO30
Leading reported evidence
Repair from a little parking lot incident
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If I lived closer I would take you for a ride......oh wait my car is in the shop getting repaired from a little parking lot incident.
Leading evidence: 'Repair from a little parking lot incident' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Repair from a little parking lot incident' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Hey I will have a slightly used Aero rear decklid for cheap if your interested.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Also, doesn't Porsche state that you should not use the aero kit unless you are using all of it?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Meaning, you should be using the parts of the kit without using the whole kit.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
24 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T091943Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I suspect that I know where this will end up, but my wife has expressed a desire to spruce up the 996 for Christmas and has enlisted the rest of the family.... It is Aerokit vs. suspension
I have the Mk1 Aerokit side skirts in the basement courtesy of FLY996, but will need to get a front bumper or lip.
or
I can go with the M030 RoW.
I can't decide, so I figured I would poll the collective
Ring a ding ding! I could not be happier with the X74. It is not that harsh. If I lived closer I would take you for a ride......oh wait my car is in the shop getting repaired from a little parking lot incident. Hey I will have a slightly used Aero rear decklid for cheap if your interested. New they are 6K..... used ???
My vote - TechArt Coilovers and get the car out of the Clouds. Lowers 35 mm - just cause it's a C4 doesn't mean it should look like a 4 X 4. ... but then that is somewhat biased just IMHO. Better looking and better handling!
About $800 more plus a smile you can't let go. Lowers the car 40mm from stock height with new stiffer struts and sways. I felt like I had just got my drivers license when I got!
If you get either suspension you'll be hating the aero front bumper (especially if you put the splitter on it).....it will scrape on everything with stock suspension so with it 20-40mm lower I'm sure it would become a snow plow.
For reference my car is areo already and I'd take either suspension kit X74 or ROW M030 so that's no help at all.
From one Canadian to another, go for the X-74.... Its the best enhancement i've made to my car., after looking and researching all over the web, and the great assistance from sneaky Pete... I installed it last year..
I would also like to get a new aero front bumper, especially after some chick with a trailer hitch backed into me and cut my bumper last summer...
enjoy
I have to disagree with the votes here so far. I think the M030 removed the "floaty" quality from the car and lowered it a bit. While it is a bit more harsh than before it's nothing I can't live with, especially with the improved handling at speed, but my wife thinks it's too rough and we have really smooth roads here. I think any lower and tighter would be a problem, especially if you DD the car.
Same here. For the record, I'd like to go lower with mine but I'm already scraping the front spoiler on darn near everything. My wife tells me I clear parking lot speed bumps by less than the width of a finger.
She'll get more visually from the spoiler and side panels but more feel from the suspension kit. Which do you think she would like more?
+1 If you are eventually going to get both the aero kit and the suspension, get the M030. Especially if this is a DD. The aero kit will get hammered with the X74 on brutal roads.
Also, doesn't Porsche state that you should not use the aero kit unless you are using all of it? Meaning, you should be using the parts of the kit without using the whole kit. High speed handling is dramatically effected.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
