fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Advice needed on a dispute with an Insurance Claim

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
5 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHAdvice needed on a dispute with an Insurance Claim

Leading reported evidence

Repair shop as a result of improperly lifting my car

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

A month or so ago, one of my AC lines was dented by a tire repair shop as a result of improperly lifting my car.

Original post Read captured discussion
Advice needed on a dispute with an Insurance Claim
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Repair shop as a result of improperly lifting my car' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Repair shop as a result of improperly lifting my car' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 5 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Repair shop as a result of improperly lifting my car

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

A month or so ago, one of my AC lines was dented by a tire repair shop as a result of improperly lifting my car.

Original post Read captured discussion
Advice needed on a dispute with an Insurance Claim
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T173940Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

A month or so ago, one of my AC lines was dented by a tire repair shop as a result of improperly lifting my car. Nonetheless, the shop filed a claim against their insurance company based on a quote that I received form a Porsche dealer in NYC. (Manhattan Motor Cars) Total estimate was 5 hrs of labor @ $140 = $700 and $250.00 in parts. Approx $1,000.00 with tax. Today I received an offer to settle at $500 The main discrepancy that they point out is the labor charges, but not the hrs. involved but the $140 per hr that Porsche is charging. The insurance Co. claims that the per hr. charge should be $40!? No one will work on a hyundai for that amt of money with half decent equipment, let alone a Porsche. Has anyone had dealings with this type of situation? Is there some regulation or rights that I have to be able and substanitate a higher rate, as the car should be serviced by a certified Porsche Shop? The name of the insurance company is Utica National Insurance Group.

POST 2Original post

I would offer to take the car to any authorized Porsche service facility that they can find that will do the labor for $40/hr. (within reasonable driving distance, of course).

POST 3Original post

talk to your own insurance agent. sometimes if you file a claim with your insurance company, they'll drag it out of the other insurance co. none of them like to pay very much...

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Called the insurance Co back and they are willing to negotiate. Lets see on Monday.

POST 5Original post

There shouldn't be ANY negotiation. Tell the guys that did the damage that they will be responsible for the difference....if there is any. Why should you be left holding the bag for someone elses mistake?

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.